IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i3-4p557-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experience health practitioners have when working with families to safeguard children and the invisibility of the emotions work involved

Author

Listed:
  • Jillian Taylor
  • Pam Smith
  • Julie Taylor

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the emotions work undertaken by practitioners with responsibility for the safeguarding of child well‐being and establish whether there is a relationship between emotion work, role visibility, professional well‐being and effectiveness of supportive frameworks. Background Protecting children is the responsibility of everyone in society with health, social care and public health services leading this worldwide. To safeguard children effectively, it is known that practitioners build relationships with families in sometimes challenging situations, which involve the management of emotions. However, irrespective of this current knowledge; health practitioners who work in this area suggest that their child safeguarding role is not recognised, respected or valued in professional and societal settings. The purpose of this study was to report on a qualitative study which set out to explore the relationship between the known relational‐based emotions work of practitioners' and the reported lack of visibility. Methods Hermeneutic phenomenology underpinned the study. Semistructured interviews were employed for data collection. Ten participants actively working with preschool children and families in healthcare organisations were recruited. Results The emotional‐, relationship‐ and communicative‐based work crucial to effectively safeguard children may influence the visibility of the role. Poor role visibility influences the morale of practitioners and the support they receive. Conclusion In conclusion this study proposes that when there is poor role recognition; there is ineffective clinical support. This reduces professional well‐being, which in turn will impact practitioner abilities to safeguard children. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights that to sustain safe and effective health and social care practice, organisational leads require an understanding of the impact emotional‐ and relational‐based work can have on practitioners and provide supportive frameworks that will effectively promote professional well‐being.

Suggested Citation

  • Jillian Taylor & Pam Smith & Julie Taylor, 2017. "A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experience health practitioners have when working with families to safeguard children and the invisibility of the emotions work involved," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 557-567, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:557-567
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13486
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belinda Mawhinney & Jennifer A. Fraser, 2023. "Engagement and Retention of Families in Universal Australian Nurse-Home-Visiting Services: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:557-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.