IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i3-4p514-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of nurses' mental workloads using subjective methods

Author

Listed:
  • Betül Sönmez
  • Zeynep Oğuz
  • Leman Kutlu
  • Aytolan Yıldırım

Abstract

Aims and objectives To adapt the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scale into Turkish, to determine the nurses' mental workload using subjective methods and to identify the factors affecting the mental workloads of nurses. Background As the concept of safety gains prominence in healthcare services, the determination of employees' mental workloads using subjective methods is considered important in preventing errors caused by employees. Design Methodological and descriptive design. Methods The population of the study consisted of a total of 1900 nurses working at three hospitals and a dentistry faculty hospital affiliated with a public university in Istanbul. The sample of the study consisted of 1266 nurses who agreed to participate in the study (the rate of return was 66·6%). Language and content validity and reliability measurements were performed to adapt the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index into Turkish, which was used as the data collection tool. Results It was found that the mean total mental workload score of the nurses was 80·48 (SD 11·76), and the weighted score of mental workload was 83·7. While the highest mean score was obtained on the subscale of mental demand (88·08, SD 16·12), the lowest mean score was obtained on the subscale of frustration (54·52, SD 29·96). The mean total mental workload score of the nurses showed a significant difference according to the units in which the nurses worked. Conclusion The mean mental workload scores of nurses working at hospitals within the scope of the study were higher than the results of other studies. Relevance to clinical practice It is recommended that nurse managers perform mental workload measurements of nurses and compare the results with the quality indicators observed in units to determine and employ a labour force that is qualified for the profession and that may benefit more effectively from human resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Betül Sönmez & Zeynep Oğuz & Leman Kutlu & Aytolan Yıldırım, 2017. "Determination of nurses' mental workloads using subjective methods," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 514-523, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:514-523
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13476
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:514-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.