IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i3-4p477-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of self‐efficacy and quality of life in patients with temporary enterostomy: a cross‐sectional survey

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Su
  • Li Zhen
  • Mulan Zhu
  • Yinyi Kuang
  • Fang Qin
  • Xinmei Ye
  • Xuexia Yin
  • Huizhen Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify determinants of self‐efficacy and quality of life in patients with temporary enterostomy. Background Anterior resection with temporary enterostomy is the preferred treatment for patients with rectal cancer, which may impair patients’ quality of life. So far, most studies have focused on quality of life in patients with permanent enterostomy, but few studies have looked at that in those with temporary enterostomy. Self‐efficacy may determine quality of life in these patients, but few studies have identified determinants of self‐efficacy and quality of life. Design Multicentre, cross‐sectional survey and regression analysis to identify determinants of self‐efficacy and quality of life. Methods A convenience sample of patients undergoing temporary enterostomy at five hospitals in Guangdong Province (China) were surveyed at least four weeks after stoma surgery using validated Chinese versions of internationally recognised questionnaires, including a Stoma Self‐Efficacy Scale and the City of Hope Quality of Life–Ostomy Questionnaire. Backward multiple regression analysis was performed to identify whether quality of life was determined by self‐efficacy and other clinico‐demographic characteristics. Results Of the 180 questionnaires distributed, 149 (82·8%) were returned, and 135 (75%) were used in the final analysis. Mean global quality of life was 5·40 ± 1·58, and mean global self‐efficacy was 79·59 ± 20·21. Significant determinants of self‐efficacy and quality of life were identified (β = 0·62, p

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Su & Li Zhen & Mulan Zhu & Yinyi Kuang & Fang Qin & Xinmei Ye & Xuexia Yin & Huizhen Wang, 2017. "Determinants of self‐efficacy and quality of life in patients with temporary enterostomy: a cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 477-484, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:477-484
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13469
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne K Danielsen & Erik E Soerensen & Kirsten Burcharth & Jacob Rosenberg, 2013. "Impact of a temporary stoma on patients' everyday lives: feelings of uncertainty while waiting for closure of the stoma," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1343-1352, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Reinwalds & Andrea Blixter & Eva Carlsson, 2018. "Living with a resected rectum after rectal cancer surgery—Struggling not to let bowel function control life," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 623-634, February.
    2. Frida Olsson & Carina Berterö, 2015. "Living with faecal incontinence: trying to control the daily life that is out of control," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 141-150, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:3-4:p:477-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.