IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p5133-5142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grief reactions of couples to perinatal loss: A one‐year prospective follow‐up

Author

Listed:
  • Ying‐Fen Tseng
  • Hsiu‐Rong Cheng
  • Yu‐Ping Chen
  • Shu‐Fei Yang
  • Pi‐Tzu Cheng

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore couples’ perceptions of the effects of perinatal loss on their marital relationship, social support and grief 1 year postloss, and analyse what factors changed the severity of their grief. Background Perinatal losses are traumatic events in the lives of families and can have serious long‐term consequences for the psychological health of parents and any subsequent children. Design A prospective follow‐up study. Methods We recruited, at a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan, a convenience sample of 30 couples whose babies either miscarried or were stillborn. At 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and 1 year (T4) after the pregnancy loss, all participants completed four questionnaires. To analyse the changing status of their grief and its related factors, we used a generalised estimating equation (GEE) to account for correlations between repeated observations. Results Postbereavement grief levels fell over the four time‐points. Mothers reported feeling more grief than did the fathers. Couples with a history of infertility, no religious beliefs or no living children before the loss felt more grief from a perinatal miscarriage or stillbirth. Furthermore, couples reported more grief if their marital satisfaction level was low, if their socioemotional support from husband's parents was low or if they had never participated in a ritual for their deceased baby. Conclusions Six months postloss is the crucial period for bereaved parents after a perinatal loss. Being a mother, having no previous living children and low‐level socioemotional support from the husband's parents are significant high‐risk factors for a high level of grief 1 year after perinatal death. Relevance to clinical practice We recommend that health professionals increase their ability to identify the factors that psychologically affect postloss grief. Active postloss follow‐up programmes should focus on these factors to offer specific support and counselling.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying‐Fen Tseng & Hsiu‐Rong Cheng & Yu‐Ping Chen & Shu‐Fei Yang & Pi‐Tzu Cheng, 2017. "Grief reactions of couples to perinatal loss: A one‐year prospective follow‐up," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5133-5142, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5133-5142
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cayetano Fernández-Sola & Marcos Camacho-Ávila & José Manuel Hernández-Padilla & Isabel María Fernández-Medina & Francisca Rosa Jiménez-López & Encarnación Hernández-Sánchez & María Belén Conesa-Ferre, 2020. "Impact of Perinatal Death on the Social and Family Context of the Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Michelle Herminia Mesquita de Castro & Carolina Rodrigues Mendonça & Matias Noll & Fernanda Sardinha de Abreu Tacon & Waldemar Naves do Amaral, 2021. "Psychosocial Aspects of Gestational Grief in Women Undergoing Infertility Treatment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5133-5142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.