IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p5093-5102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The culture contributing to interruptions in the nursing work environment: An ethnography

Author

Listed:
  • Susan G Hopkinson
  • Debra L Wiegand

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the occurrence of interruptions within the culture of the medical nursing unit work environment. Background Interruptions may lead to errors in nursing work. Little is known about how the culture of the nursing work environment contributes to interruptions. Design A micro‐focused ethnographic study was conducted. Method Data collection involved extensive observation of a nursing unit, 1:1 observations of nurses and follow‐up interviews with the nurses. Data were analysed from unstructured field notes and interview transcripts. The definitions of interruption and culture guided coding, categorising and identification of themes. Results A framework was developed that describes the medical nursing unit as a complex culture full of unpredictable, nonlinear changes that affect the entire interconnected system, often in the form of an interruption. The cultural elements contributing to interruptions included (i) the value placed on excellence in patient care and meeting personal needs, (ii) the beliefs that the nurses had to do everything by themselves and that every phone call was important, (iii) the patterns of changing patients, patient transport and coordination of resources and (iv) the normative practices of communicating and adapting. Conclusions Interruptions are an integral part of the culture of a medical nursing unit. Uniformly decreasing interruptions may disrupt current practices, such as communication to coordinate care, that are central to nursing work. In future research, the nursing work environment must be looked at through the lens of a complex system. Relevance to clinical practice Interventions to minimise the negative impact of interruptions must take into account the culture of the nursing as a complex adaptive system. Nurses should be educated on their own contribution to interruptions and issues addressed at a system level, rather than isolating the interruption as the central issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan G Hopkinson & Debra L Wiegand, 2017. "The culture contributing to interruptions in the nursing work environment: An ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 5093-5102, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5093-5102
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Gregory & Heather Waterman, 2012. "Observing pain management practice on a medical unit following changes arising from an action research study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3523-3531, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:5093-5102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.