IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4985-4993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived social support and the sense of coherence in patient–caregiver dyad versus acceptance of illness in cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Pasek
  • Grażyna Dębska
  • Ewa Wojtyna

Abstract

Background Acceptance of illness is a significant determinant of further coping with a disease. Development of illness acceptance may be associated with the sense of coherence and perception of social support. Cancer is an example of a crisis situation, which affects both the patient and his/her close relatives. Consequently, acceptance of illness may be influenced by factors originating from both sides of caregiver–patient dyad. The aim of this study was to analyse direct and indirect interrelationships between perceived support and the sense of coherence in patient–caregiver dyad, and acceptance of illness in cancer patients. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods The study included 80 dyads composed of cancer patients and their caregivers. Only cancer patients undergoing oncological treatment at the time of the study, for at least 3 months but no longer than 12 months, were enrolled. All subjects completed perceived support subscale included in the Berlin Social Support Scales, sense of coherence‐29 questionnaire to determine the sense of coherence and Acceptance of Illness Scale. Results Compared to cancer patients, their caregivers presented with significantly lower levels of perceived social support and weaker sense of coherence. The sense of coherence in caregivers and patients was determined by their perceived support levels. The sense of coherence in caregivers turned out to be a key resource influencing acceptance of illness in cancer patients, both directly and indirectly, via their perceived social support and their sense of coherence. Conclusions The sense of coherence, an intrinsic psychological factor determined by social support, is an important determinant of illness acceptance. Functioning of cancer patients is also modulated by psychosocial characteristics of their caregivers. Relevance to clinical practice Greater support offered to caregivers may substantially strengthen the sense of coherence in caregivers and cancer patients and, therefore, may improve the functioning of patient–caregiver dyad in a situation of neoplastic disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Pasek & Grażyna Dębska & Ewa Wojtyna, 2017. "Perceived social support and the sense of coherence in patient–caregiver dyad versus acceptance of illness in cancer patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4985-4993, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4985-4993
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13997
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felton, Barbara J. & Revenson, Tracey A. & Hinrichsen, Gregory A., 1984. "Stress and coping in the explanation of psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 18(10), pages 889-898, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golden, Jeannette & Conroy, Ronán Michael & Marie O'Dwyer, Ann & Golden, Daniel & Hardouin, Jean-Benoit, 2006. "Illness-related stigma, mood and adjustment to illness in persons with hepatitis C," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 3188-3198, December.
    2. Wojciech Otrębski & Katarzyna Mariańczyk & Karolina Krzysztofik, 2022. "Selected Personality Traits and Employment as the Predictors of the Intensity of Psychosocial Problems Experienced by Chronically Ill Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Katarzyna Mariańczyk & Wojciech Otrębski & Karolina Krzysztofik, 2022. "The Function of Occupational Activity for Health as Perceived by Chronically Ill People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Ai Suzuki & Hirono Ishikawa & Masafumi Okada, 2021. "Development, Validation, and Internal Consistency of the Positive Psychology-Based Acceptance of Illness Scale (PAIS): A Culturally-Appropriate Japanese Measure," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    5. Joanna Dymecka & Rafał Gerymski & Rafał Tataruch & Mariola Bidzan, 2021. "Fatigue, Physical Disability and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Acceptance of Illness and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Wun Chin Leong & Nor Aniza Azmi & Lei Hum Wee & Harenthri Devy Alagir Rajah & Caryn Mei Hsien Chan, 2021. "Validation and reliability of the Bahasa Malaysia language version of the Acceptance of Illness Scale among Malaysian patients with cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Inge M Brokerhof & Jan Fekke Ybema & P Matthijs Bal, 2020. "Illness narratives and chronic patients’ sustainable employability: The impact of positive work stories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Beata Hornik & Jan Duława, 2019. "Frailty, Quality of Life, Anxiety, and Other Factors Affecting Adherence to Physical Activity Recommendations by Hemodialysis Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Johnson, Blair T. & Acabchuk, Rebecca L., 2018. "What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 218-226.
    10. Sung Soo Lim, 2020. "The Effects of Chronic Illness on Aspirations and Subjective Wellbeing," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1771-1793, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4985-4993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.