IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4936-4944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinicians’ perceptions and recognition of practice improvement strategies to prevent harms to older people in acute care hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Michele McGrath
  • Mari Botti
  • Bernice Redley

Abstract

Aims and objectives Explore clinicians’ perceptions of practice improvement strategies used to prevent harms to older people during acute hospitalisation. Background Older people are vulnerable to many interrelated preventable harms during acute care hospitalisation. Improvement strategies recommend standardisation of practices to assist healthcare staff to mitigate risk; however, older people continue to suffer preventable harms in acute hospitals. Methods A qualitative exploratory descriptive design was used to collect data using focus groups and individual interviews from a purposive sample of 33 participants. Participants represented a wide range of clinicians from four diverse healthcare organisations. Qualitative content analysis used a framework informed by common preventable harms derived from key literature and policy documents. Results Participants’ perceptions of practice improvement strategies varied depending on their role within their organisational hierarchy. Recognition of preventable harms was guided by standard risk assessment and management tools used in their organisations. Preventable harms relating to skin integrity and falls were universally recognised across all sites and roles. Alternatively, there was variability in participant recognition of preventable harms related to nutrition, continence, medications and cognition; pain was consistently overlooked as a contributor to preventable harms. Conclusions Hospital staff perceived standard clinical risk assessment and management tools as the main practice improvement strategy to prevent harms. These tools prompted staff recognition of preventable harms to older people during acute hospitalisation. Variability in the recognition of some preventable harms was attributed to variable use of standard assessment tools. Pain was unlikely to be recognised as contributing to preventable harms. Relevance to clinical practice Clinical Risk Management tools may assist clinicians in recognising and responding to preventable harms to older people during hospitalisation. These tools provide critical resources for consistent and timely assessment and evaluation of risk for preventable harms.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele McGrath & Mari Botti & Bernice Redley, 2017. "Clinicians’ perceptions and recognition of practice improvement strategies to prevent harms to older people in acute care hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4936-4944, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4936-4944
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13978
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harriet Udin Aronow & Jeff Borenstein & Flora Haus & Glenn D. Braunstein & Linda Burnes Bolton, 2014. "Validating SPICES as a Screening Tool for Frailty Risks among Hospitalized Older Adults," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-5, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ella Ottrey & Judi Porter & Catherine E. Huggins & Claire Palermo, 2019. "Ward culture and staff relationships at hospital mealtimes in Australia: An ethnographic account," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 78-84, March.
    2. Bernice Redley & Tim Baker, 2019. "Have you SCAND MMe Please? A framework to prevent harm during acute hospitalisation of older persons: A retrospective audit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 560-574, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4936-4944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.