IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4786-4794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An observational study of patient care outcomes sensitive to handover quality in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Nichole Lillibridge
  • Mari Botti
  • Beverley Wood
  • Bernice Redley

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify patient care outcome indicators sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover between the anaesthetist and the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit nurse. Background The relationship between interprofessional clinical handover when patients are transferred from the operating theatre to the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit and patient outcomes of subsequent patient care delivery is not well understood. Design Naturalistic, exploratory descriptive design using observation. Methods Observations of 31 patient journeys through Post‐Anaesthetic Care Units across three public and private hospitals. Characteristics of interprofessional handover on arrival in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit, the trajectory of patient care activities in Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit and patient outcomes were observed. Results Of the 821 care activities observed across 31 “patient journeys” in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit, observations (assessments and vital signs) (52.5 %), communication (15.8 %) and pain management (assessment of pain and analgesic administration) (10.3%) were most common. Examination of patterns in handover communications and subsequent trajectories of patient care activities revealed three patient trajectory typologies and two patient outcome indicators expected to be sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover communication in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit: pain on discharge from the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit and timely response to clinical deterioration. An additional process indicator, seeking missing information, was also identified. Conclusions Patient's pain on discharge from Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit, escalation of care in response to early signs of deterioration and the need for nurses to seek out missing information to deliver care are indicators expected to be sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover communication in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit. Future research should test these indicators. Relevance to clinical practice Patient outcomes sensitive to the quality of interprofessional handover on patient arrival in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit can be used to evaluate handover quality improvement initiatives. Quality handovers can improve management of pain and clinical deterioration in Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit and reduce time wasted searching for missing information.

Suggested Citation

  • Nichole Lillibridge & Mari Botti & Beverley Wood & Bernice Redley, 2017. "An observational study of patient care outcomes sensitive to handover quality in the Post‐Anaesthetic Care Unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4786-4794, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4786-4794
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13833
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4786-4794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.