IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4413-4424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustaining guideline implementation: A multisite perspective on activities, challenges and supports

Author

Listed:
  • Kathryn S Higuchi
  • Barbara Davies
  • Jenny Ploeg

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine activities conducted, challenges encountered and supports used when sustaining nursing practice guideline implementation in multiple healthcare organisations over 3 years. Background Numerous models and frameworks exist to guide the implementation of guidelines, yet very few focus on sustaining improved practice changes. It is not known if one intervention or multiple interventions are required, nor the long‐term activities, challenges and supports for sustaining improved practices. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Methods We conducted focus group interviews with steering committee members and individual interviews with leaders and direct care providers at the end of a 3‐year guideline implementation study. The National Health Service Sustainability Model was used to guide data collection and analysis. Results The eight sites included three teaching hospitals, a community hospital, a long‐term care facility, two community health agencies and a community health centre. Individual interviews were conducted with 36 leaders and 26 direct care providers. Focus group interviews were conducted with steering committee members (n = 70) at each site. Guideline implementation activities (n = 45) included developing new outcome monitoring systems, conducting chart audits, communicating progress to internal stakeholders, appointing interprofessional staff to steering committees, developing educational sessions and resources for staff and patients, revising policies and procedures, and developing partnerships with external organisations. Supports included lessons learned from previous and concurrent change initiatives, and commitment, involvement and positive attitudes of staff and leaders. Conclusion Activities identified by the participants addressed all 10 factors in the Sustainability Model in the three areas of process, staff and organisation. The challenges and supports encountered provide insights into the process of guideline implementation and sustainability. Relevance to clinical practice A multilevel action plan for staff, leaders and the organisation is recommended when introducing and sustaining practice changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathryn S Higuchi & Barbara Davies & Jenny Ploeg, 2017. "Sustaining guideline implementation: A multisite perspective on activities, challenges and supports," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4413-4424, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4413-4424
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn Smith Higuchi & Angela Downey & Barbara Davies & Irmajean Bajnok & Melissa Waggott, 2013. "Using the NHS sustainability framework to understand the activities and resource implications of Canadian nursing guideline early adopters," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(11-12), pages 1707-1716, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Lunden & Marianne Teräs & Tarja Kvist & Arja Häggman‐Laitila, 2019. "Transformative agency and tensions in knowledge management—A qualitative interview study for nurse leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 969-979, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4413-4424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.