Author
Listed:
- Christina Melin‐Johansson
- Rebecca Palmqvist
- Linda Rönnberg
Abstract
Aims and objectives To review what is characteristic of registered nurses’ intuition in clinical settings, in relationships and in the nursing process. Background Intuition is a controversial concept and nurses believe that there are difficulties in how they should explain their nursing actions or decisions based on intuition. Much of the evidence from the body of research indicates that nurses value their intuition in a variety of clinical settings. More information on how nurses integrate intuition as a core element in daily clinical work would contribute to an improved understanding on how they go about this. Intuition deserves a place in evidence‐based activities, where intuition is an important component associated with the nursing process. Design An integrative review strengthened with a mixed‐studies review. Methods Literature searches were conducted in the databases CINAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO, and literature published 1985–2016 were included. The findings in the studies were analysed with content analysis, and the synthesis process entailed a reasoning between the authors. Results After a quality assessment, 16 studies were included. The analysis and synthesis resulted in three categories. The characteristics of intuition in the nurse's daily clinical activities include application, assertiveness and experiences; in the relationships with patients’ intuition include unique connections, mental and bodily responses, and personal qualities; and in the nursing process include support and guidance, component and clues in decision‐making, and validating decisions. Conclusion Intuition is more than simply a “gut feeling,” and it is a process based on knowledge and care experience and has a place beside research‐based evidence. Nurses integrate both analysis and synthesis of intuition alongside objective data when making decisions. They should rely on their intuition and use this knowledge in clinical practice as a support in decision‐making, which increases the quality and safety of patient care. Relevance to clinical practice We find that intuition plays a key role in more or less all of the steps in the nursing process as a base for decision‐making that supports safe patient care, and is a validated component of nursing clinical care expertise.
Suggested Citation
Christina Melin‐Johansson & Rebecca Palmqvist & Linda Rönnberg, 2017.
"Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision‐making—A mixed‐studies review,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3936-3949, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3936-3949
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13814
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Apiradee Nantsupawat & Orn‐Anong Wichaikhum & Kulwadee Abhicharttibutra & Wipada Kunaviktikul & Mohd Said Bin Nurumal & Lusine Poghosyan, 2020.
"Nurses' knowledge of health literacy, communication techniques, and barriers to the implementation of health literacy programs: A cross‐sectional study,"
Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 577-585, September.
- Christine W. Nibbelink & Barbara B. Brewer, 2018.
"Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 917-928, March.
- Sunyoung Oh & Minkyung Gu & Sohyune Sok, 2022.
"A Concept Analysis of Nurses’ Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3936-3949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.