IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p3843-3858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberating burdensomeness of suicide survivorship loss: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Anne‐Grethe Talseth
  • Fredricka L Gilje

Abstract

Aims and objectives What is an interpreted and synthesised understanding of responses of survivors to a suicide death of a close person? Background It is well known that survivors of suicide loss who are in a close relationship with the deceased are at high risk for suicidality and health conditions. Nurses in various settings need evidenced‐informed approaches to encounter these vulnerable persons and support their healing journey from postvention to prevention. Design The design is reflexive and iterative. Method A Critical Interpretive Synthesis comprised of six phases: formulating the review question; searching literature; sampling; determining quality; extracting data; interpretive synthesis. Qualitative content analysis was also. Results Based on a sample of 15 published full‐text qualitative and quantitative nursing research studies published between 1990 and 2016, an aggregated, interpreted and synthesised understanding of responses of survivors of suicide loss to the suicide death of a close person emerged. Four synthesised concepts were: dreading burden of suicide risk and stigma; facing burdensomeness in the aftermath of suicide death; enduring being burdened‐unburdened, striving to invest in living; and liberating burdensomeness, journeying toward healing. Conclusions Contextually, geo‐cultural gaps exist in published nursing studies. Most studies were from North American and a few from Asia. The reported suicide deaths occurred over a wide range of time. Conceptually, four synthesised concepts can be viewed as a process of moving from burdensomeness to liberating burdensomeness. Methodologically, a small body of knowledge that met quality appraisal was interpreted and synthesised into an understanding of an evidenced‐informed approach to guide nurses' encounters with survivors of suicide loss. Relevance to clinical practice The results contribute to an evidenced‐informed approach for nurses in practice to support survivors of suicide loss journeying from burdensomeness to liberating burdensomeness. Results also serve as a foundation for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne‐Grethe Talseth & Fredricka L Gilje, 2017. "Liberating burdensomeness of suicide survivorship loss: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3843-3858, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3843-3858
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13797
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3843-3858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.