IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i21-22p3588-3596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of evidence‐based sepsis guidelines on emergency department clinical practice: a pre‐post medical record audit

Author

Listed:
  • Bernadine Romero
  • Margaret Fry
  • Michael Roche

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the number of patients presenting with sepsis before and after guideline implementation; the impact of sepsis guidelines on triage assessment, emergency department management and time to antibiotics. Background Sepsis remains one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity within hospitals. Globally, strategies have been implemented to reduce morbidity and mortality rates, which rely on the early recognition and management of sepsis. To improve patient outcomes, the New South Wales government in Australia introduced sepsis guidelines into emergency departments. However, the impact of the guidelines on clinical practice remains unclear. Design/Methods A 12‐month pre‐post retrospective randomised medical record audit of adult patients with a sepsis diagnosis. Data were extracted from the emergency department database and paper medical record. Data included patient demographic (age, gender), clinical information (time of arrival, triage code, seen by time, disposition, time to antibiotic, pathology, time to intravenous fluids) and patient assessment data (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, temperature, oxygen saturations, medication). Results This study demonstrated a statistically significant 230‐minute reduction in time to antibiotics post implementation of the guidelines. The post group (n = 165) received more urgent triage categories (n = 81; 49·1%), a 758‐minute reduction in mean time to second litre of intravenous fluids and an improvement in collection of lactate (n = 112, 67·9%), also statistically significant. Conclusions The findings highlight the impact the guidelines can have on clinician decision‐making and behaviour that support best practice and positive patient outcomes. The sepsis guidelines improved the early assessment, recognition and management of patients presenting with sepsis in one tertiary referral emergency department. Relevance to clinical practice The use of evidenced‐based guidelines can impact clinical decision‐making and behaviour, resulting in the translation and support of best practice and improving patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernadine Romero & Margaret Fry & Michael Roche, 2017. "The impact of evidence‐based sepsis guidelines on emergency department clinical practice: a pre‐post medical record audit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3588-3596, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3588-3596
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3588-3596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.