IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i21-22p3576-3587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accessing new understandings of trauma‐informed care with queer birthing women in a rural context

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Searle
  • Lisa Goldberg
  • Megan Aston
  • Sylvia Burrow

Abstract

Aims and objectives Participant narratives from a feminist and queer phenomenological study aim to broaden current understandings of trauma. Examining structural marginalisation within perinatal care relationships provides insights into the impact of dominant models of care on queer birthing women. More specifically, validation of queer experience as a key finding from the study offers trauma‐informed strategies that reconstruct formerly disempowering perinatal relationships. Background Heteronormativity governs birthing spaces and presents considerable challenges for queer birthing women who may also have an increased risk of trauma due to structurally marginalising processes that create and maintain socially constructed differences. Design Analysis of the qualitative data was guided by feminist and queer phenomenology. This was well suited to understanding queer women's storied narratives of trauma, including disempowering processes of structural marginalisation. Methods Semistructured and conversational interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of thirteen queer‐identified women who had experiences of birthing in rural Nova Scotia, Canada. Results Validation was identified as meaningful for queer women in the context of perinatal care in rural Nova Scotia. Offering new perspectives on traditional models of assessment provide strategies to create a context of care that reconstructs the birthing space insofar as women at risk do not have to come out as queer in opposition to the expectation of heterosexuality. Conclusions Normative practices were found to further the effects of structural marginalisation suggesting that perinatal care providers, including nurses, can challenge dominant models of care and reconstruct the relationality between queer women and formerly disempowering expectations of heteronormativity that govern birthing spaces. Relevance to clinical practice New trauma‐informed assessment strategies reconstruct the relationality within historically disempowering perinatal relationships through potentiating difference which avoids retraumatising women with re‐experiencing the process of coming out as queer in opposition to the expectation of heterosexuality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Searle & Lisa Goldberg & Megan Aston & Sylvia Burrow, 2017. "Accessing new understandings of trauma‐informed care with queer birthing women in a rural context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3576-3587, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3576-3587
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max van Manen & Isabel Higgins & Pamela van der Riet, 2016. "A conversation with Max van Manen on phenomenology in its original sense," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 4-7, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brianna Richardson & Sheri Price & Marsha Campbell‐Yeo, 2019. "Redefining perinatal experience: A philosophical exploration of a hypothetical case of gender diversity in labour and birth," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3-4), pages 703-710, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette Peart & Virginia Lewis & Chris Barton & Grant Russell, 2020. "Healthcare professionals providing care coordination to people living with multimorbidity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2317-2328, July.
    2. Manee Arpanantikul, 2018. "Women's perspectives on home‐based care for family members with chronic illness: An Interpretive phenomenology study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 494-501, December.
    3. Geldine Chironda & Busisiwe Rosemary Bhengu, 2019. "Motivators of adherence to integrated management among patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 63-70, March.
    4. Weili Gao & Virginia Plummer & Lisa McKenna, 2020. "Using metaphor method to interpret and understand meanings of international operating room nurses' experiences in organ procurement surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4604-4613, December.
    5. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3576-3587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.