IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i21-22p3500-3510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postoperative pain: knowledge and beliefs of patients and nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline FM van Dijk
  • Marieke J Schuurmans
  • Eva E Alblas
  • Cor J Kalkman
  • Albert JM van Wijck

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe patients' and nurses' knowledge and beliefs regarding pain management. Moreover, to explore the effect of information and education on patients' and nurses’ knowledge and beliefs regarding pain management. Background In the treatment of postoperative pain, patients' and nurses' inadequate knowledge and erroneous beliefs may hamper the appropriate use of analgesics. Design A randomised controlled trial and a cross‐sectional study. Methods In 2013, half of 760 preoperative patients were allocated to the intervention group and received written information about the complications of postoperative pain. The knowledge and beliefs of 1184 nurses were studied in 2014 in a cross‐sectional study. All data were collected with the same questionnaires. Results In the intervention group, patients' knowledge level was significant higher than in the control group, while no differences were found in beliefs. Nurses had higher knowledge and more positive beliefs towards pain management compared with both patient groups. Nurses with additional pain education scored better than nurses without additional pain education. Nurses were also asked what percentage of pain scores matched their impression of the patient's pain, and the mean was found to be 63%. Conclusions Written information was effective for increasing patients' knowledge. However, it was not effective for changing beliefs about analgesics and patients and nurses had erroneous beliefs about analgesics. Relevance to clinical practice It is necessary to continue to inform patients and nurses about the need for analgesics after surgery. Such education could also emphasise that a discrepancy between a patient's reported pain score and the nurse's own assessment of the patient's pain should prompt a discussion with the patient about his/her pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline FM van Dijk & Marieke J Schuurmans & Eva E Alblas & Cor J Kalkman & Albert JM van Wijck, 2017. "Postoperative pain: knowledge and beliefs of patients and nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3500-3510, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3500-3510
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3500-3510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.