IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p3056-3066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed‐methods study exploring sign‐off mentorship practices in relation to the Nursing and Midwifery Council standards

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Newton
  • Rachel M Taylor
  • Liz Crighton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the current practice and experience of sign‐off mentors in one NHS trust. Background In the UK, sign‐off mentors support nursing students in their last clinical placement and are accountable for the final assessment of fitness to practice as a registered nurse. Design Mixed‐methods study. Methods The focus was on two key Nursing and Midwifery Council standards: the requirement for students to work at least 40% of their time on clinical placement with a sign‐off mentor/mentor; the sign‐off mentor had one‐hour‐per‐week protected time to meet the final placement student. Data were collected through two audits of clinical and university documents and an experience survey administered to all sign‐off mentors in one trust. Results The audits showed that only 22/42 (52%) of students were supervised by their sign‐off mentor/mentor at least 40% of the time, whilst 10/42 (24%) students never worked a shift with their sign‐off mentor. Only one student met their sign‐off mentor every week. Complete data were available in 31/64 (47%) sign‐off mentors, of whom 21/30 (70%) rarely/never had reduced clinical commitment to mentor final placement students. Furthermore, 19/28 (68%) met their student after their shift had ended with 24/30 (80%) reporting not getting any protected time. Conclusion Sign‐off mentors have inadequate time and resources to undertake their role, yet are accountable for confirming the student has the required knowledge and skills to practise safely. The current model needs urgent review to improve mentoring standards. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding how the role of the sign‐off mentor is working in practice is critical to ensuring that the Nursing and Midwifery Council standards are met, ensuring students are well supported and appropriately assessed in practice, and mentoring is given the high profile it deserves to guarantee high‐quality care and protecting the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Newton & Rachel M Taylor & Liz Crighton, 2017. "A mixed‐methods study exploring sign‐off mentorship practices in relation to the Nursing and Midwifery Council standards," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3056-3066, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3056-3066
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13652
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13652?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3056-3066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.