IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i17-18p2794-2806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a modified early warning score‐linked Situation‐Background‐Assessment‐Recommendation communication tool: A mixed methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Debora Burger
  • Sue Jordan
  • Una Kyriacos

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and validate a modified Situation‐Background‐Assessment‐Recommendation communication tool incorporating components of the Cape Town modified early warning score vital signs chart for reporting early signs of clinical deterioration. Background Reporting early signs of physiological and clinical deterioration could prevent “failure to rescue” or unexpected intensive care admission, cardiac arrest or death. A structured communication tool incorporating physiological and clinical parameters allows nurses to provide pertinent information about a deteriorating patient in a logical order. Design Mixed methods instrument development and validation. Methods We used a sequential three‐phase method: cognitive interviews, content validation and inter‐rater reliability testing to validate a self‐designed communication tool. Participants were purposively selected expert nurses and doctors in government sector hospitals in Cape Town. Results Cognitive interviews with five experts prompted most changes to the communication tool: 15/42 (35.71%) items were modified. Content validation of a revised tool was high by a predetermined ≥70% of 18 experts: 4/49 (8.2%) items were modified. Inter‐rater reliability testing by two nurses indicated substantial to full agreement (Cohen's kappa .61–1) on 37/45 (82%) items. The one item achieving slight agreement (Cohen's kappa .20) indicated a difference in clinical judgement. The high overall percentage agreement (82%) suggests that the modified items are sound. Overall, 45 items remained on the validated tool. Conclusion The first modified early warning score‐linked Situation‐Background‐Assessment‐Recommendation communication tool developed in South Africa was found to be valid and reliable in a local context. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses in South Africa can use the validated tool to provide doctors with pertinent information about a deteriorating patient in a logical order to prevent a serious adverse event. Our findings provide a reference for other African countries to develop and validate communication tools for reporting early signs of clinical deterioration.

Suggested Citation

  • Debora Burger & Sue Jordan & Una Kyriacos, 2017. "Validation of a modified early warning score‐linked Situation‐Background‐Assessment‐Recommendation communication tool: A mixed methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2794-2806, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2794-2806
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13852
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2794-2806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.