IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i17-18p2614-2623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a formal care worker educational intervention on pressure ulceration in the community

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Cross
  • Jenny Hindley
  • Nicola Carey

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and evaluate an educational intervention for formal care workers on pressure ulceration in the community. Background Pressure ulcers are a major burden to health care and with an ageing population likely to increase. Formal care workers are ideally placed to identify high risk but lack standardised educational provision. Design An insider approach to action research in one provider organisation, November 2014–May 2015. Methods Number and categorisation of pressure ulcers, within three community nursing teams before and four months after intervention was delivered to a purposive sample (n = 250) of formal care workers, were assessed and the taught element evaluated using a questionnaire and verbal feedback. Results Total number of pressure ulcers reduced from 28–20, category II, 19–11, III unchanged at 6 and IV from 2–0 following the educational intervention. Key risk factors included impaired mobility (71%), urinary incontinence (61%) and previous pressure damage (25%), and 71% had formal care worker input. The intervention was highly rated 4·95/5 by 215 (86%) formal care workers in the evaluation questionnaire. Conclusions Formal care workers receive little, if any, education on pressure ulceration. An educational intervention can have a positive effect within community care, with the potential to reduce direct costs of care. However, a standardised approach to education is required; an urgent review of the education provision to formal care workers, in the UK and around the world, is therefore essential if the potential that formal care workers offer is to be realised. Relevance to clinical practice Formal care workers are ideally placed to help identify and alert healthcare professionals about patients at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. If this potential is to be realised, a standardised approach to education is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Cross & Jenny Hindley & Nicola Carey, 2017. "Evaluation of a formal care worker educational intervention on pressure ulceration in the community," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2614-2623, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2614-2623
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13688
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilankoon M. P. Sumudrika Ilankoon & Christine S. E. Goonewardena & Rukshan C. Fernandopulle & Poruthotage P. Rasika Perera, 2020. "Effectiveness of an educational intervention on vulvo‐vaginal discharge for family healthcare workers: A nonrandomized controlled trial," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 694-705, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2614-2623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.