IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i17-18p2572-2582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital recording as a teaching and learning method in the skills laboratory

Author

Listed:
  • Ingebjørg Strand
  • Lise Gulbrandsen
  • Åshild Slettebø
  • Dagfinn Nåden

Abstract

Aim and objectives To obtain information on how nursing students react to, think about and learn from digital recording as a learning and teaching method over time. Background Based on the teaching and learning philosophy of the university college, we used digital recording as a tool in our daily sessions in skills laboratory. However, most of the studies referred to in the background review had a duration of from only a few hours to a number of days. We found it valuable to design a study with a duration of two academic semesters. Design A descriptive and interpretative design was used. Method First‐year bachelor‐level students at the department of nursing participated in the study. Data collection was carried out by employing an ‘online questionnaire’. The students answered five written, open‐ended questions after each of three practical skill sessions. Kvale and Brinkmann's three levels of understanding were employed in the analysis. Results The students reported that digital recording affected factors such as feeling safe, secure and confident and that video recording was essential in learning and training practical skills. The use of cameras proved to be useful, as an expressive tool for peer learning because video recording enhances self‐assessment, reflection, sensing, psychomotor performance and discovery learning. Conclusion Digital recording enhances the student's awareness when acquiring new knowledge because it activates cognitive and emotional learning. The connection between tutoring, feedback and technology was clear. Relevance to clinical practice The digital recorder gives students direct and immediate feedback on their performance from the various practical procedures, and may aid in the transition from theory to practice. Students experienced more self‐confidence and a feeling of safety in their performances.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingebjørg Strand & Lise Gulbrandsen & Åshild Slettebø & Dagfinn Nåden, 2017. "Digital recording as a teaching and learning method in the skills laboratory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2572-2582, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2572-2582
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13632
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ida T Bjørk & Karin Berntsen & Grethe Brynildsen & Margrete Hestetun, 2014. "Nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment in placements outside traditional hospital settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2958-2967, October.
    2. Ruth Endacott & Fiona E Bogossian & Simon J Cooper & Helen Forbes & Victoria J Kain & Susan C. Young & Joanne E Porter & the First2Act Team, 2015. "Leadership and teamwork in medical emergencies: performance of nursing students and registered nurses in simulated patient scenarios," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 90-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia L. Hart & LeeAnna Spiva & Lonnie Dolly & Kristen Lang‐Coleman & Nadia Prince‐Williams, 2016. "Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3241-3251, November.
    2. Wanich Suksathan & Luckwirun Chotisiri & Ponpun Vorasiha, 2016. "Undergraduate Students’ Perception Towards the 1st Clinical Experiences in Fundamental Nursing Skills Practicum: A Qualitative Study," International Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Mohammad A. H. Khan, vol. 2(3), pages 64-67.
    3. Claire Foley & Maura Dowling, 2019. "How do nurses use the early warning score in their practice? A case study from an acute medical unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1183-1192, April.
    4. Míriam Rodríguez-Monforte & Sofía Berlanga-Fernández & Rosa Rifà-Ros & Anna Martín-Arribas & Cristina Olivé-Adrados & Rosa Villafáfila-Ferrero & Rosa M. Pérez-Cañaveras & María Flores Vizcaya-Moreno, 2023. "Comparing Preferred and Actual Clinical Learning Environments and Perceptions of First-Year Nursing Students in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Anne Marie Lunde Husebø & Marianne Storm & Bodil Bø Våga & Adriana Rosenberg & Kristin Akerjordet, 2018. "Status of knowledge on student‐learning environments in nursing homes: A mixed‐method systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1344-1359, April.
    6. Meritxell Sastre‐Rus & Joaquín Tomás‐Sábado & Rocío Juliá‐Sanchis & Juan Francisco Roldán‐Merino & Montserrat Puig‐Llobet & María Teresa Lluch‐Canut, 2020. "Development and psychometric testing of a scale for assessing the associative stigma of mental illness in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4300-4312, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:17-18:p:2572-2582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.