IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i15-16p2362-2371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The feeling of discomfort during vaginal examination, history of abuse and sexual abuse and post‐traumatic stress disorder in women

Author

Listed:
  • Gizem Güneş
  • Zekiye Karaçam

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the feeling of discomfort during vaginal examinations, history of abuse and sexual abuse and post‐traumatic stress disorder in women to determine the correlation between these variables. Background Women who have experienced abuse or sexual abuse may feel more discomfort during vaginal examinations and may perceive a sensation similar to what they experienced during sexual abuse. Design Cross‐sectional. Methods This study included 320 women receiving a vaginal examination. The data were collected using a questionnaire composed of items related to descriptive characteristics, vaginal examinations and violence, a visual analogue scale of discomfort, and the Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder Scale‐civilian version. Results The mean score for the feeling of discomfort during vaginal examinations was 3·92 ± 3·34; 26·3% of the women described discomfort. Thirty‐eight (12%) of the 320 women had experienced emotional violence, 25 (8%) had experienced physical violence, and 25 (8%) had been forced into sexual intercourse by their spouses. Of the women, 64·7% suffered from post‐traumatic stress disorder, and physical, emotional and sexual violence were found to increase the possibility of this disorder. Exposure to emotional violence increased the possibility of discomfort during vaginal examinations by 4·5 (OR = 4·482; 95% CI = 1·421–14·134). Post‐traumatic stress disorder (OR = 1·038; 95% CI = 1·009–1·066) was found to increase the possibility of discomfort during vaginal examinations; however, as the number of live births increases, women reported a reduction in their discomfort with vaginal examinations. Conclusion This study revealed a positive correlation between discomfort during vaginal examinations and emotional violence and post‐traumatic stress disorder but a negative correlation between discomfort during vaginal examinations and the number of live births. In addition, having a history of abuse and sexual abuse was found to increase post‐traumatic stress disorder. Relevance to clinical practice Considering these findings during vaginal examinations may help change women's experiences for the positive and reduce the trauma, this procedure may cause.

Suggested Citation

  • Gizem Güneş & Zekiye Karaçam, 2017. "The feeling of discomfort during vaginal examination, history of abuse and sexual abuse and post‐traumatic stress disorder in women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2362-2371, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:15-16:p:2362-2371
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13574
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zainab Hananah Abang Abdullah & Kah Teik Chew & V Ramesh V Velayudham & Zainab Yahaya & Amilia Afzan Mohd Jamil & Muhammad Azrai Abu & Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani & Nor Azlin Mohamed Ismail, 2022. "Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:15-16:p:2362-2371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.