IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p2083-2092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Video ethnography during and after caesarean sections: methodological challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Jeni Stevens
  • Virginia Schmied
  • Elaine Burns
  • Hannah G Dahlen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the challenges of, and steps taken to successfully collect video ethnographic data during and after caesarean sections. Background Video ethnographic research uses real‐time video footage to study a cultural group or phenomenon in the natural environment. It allows researchers to discover previously undocumented practices, which in‐turn provides insight into strengths and weaknesses in practice. This knowledge can be used to translate evidence‐based interventions into practice. Design Video ethnographic design. Methods A video ethnographic approach was used to observe the contact between mothers and babies immediately after elective caesarean sections in a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. Women, their support people and staff participated in the study. Data were collected via video footage and field notes in the operating theatre, recovery and the postnatal ward. Conclusions Challenges faced whilst conducting video ethnographic research included attaining ethics approval, recruiting vast numbers of staff members and ‘vulnerable’ pregnant women, and endeavouring to be a ‘fly on the wall’ and a ‘complete observer’. There were disadvantages being an ‘insider’ whilst conducting the research because occasionally staff members requested help with clinical tasks whilst collecting data; however, it was an advantage as it enabled ease of access to the environment and staff members that were to be recruited. Despite the challenges, video ethnographic research enabled the provision of unique data that could not be attained by any other means. Relevance to clinical practice Video ethnographic data are beneficial as it provides exceptionally rich data for in‐depth analysis of interactions between the environment, equipment and people in the hospital environment. The analysis of this type of data can then be used to inform improvements for future care.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeni Stevens & Virginia Schmied & Elaine Burns & Hannah G Dahlen, 2017. "Video ethnography during and after caesarean sections: methodological challenges," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 2083-2092, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:2083-2092
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13677
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Liu & Marie Gerdtz & Elizabeth Manias, 2015. "Challenges and opportunities of undertaking a video ethnographic study to understand medication communication," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3707-3715, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.
    2. Wei Liu & Marie Gerdtz & Elizabeth Manias, 2016. "Creating opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and patient‐centred care: how nurses, doctors, pharmacists and patients use communication strategies when managing medications in an acute ho," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2943-2957, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:2083-2092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.