Author
Abstract
Aims and objectives To explore multiple perspectives on the use of physical assessment skills by advanced nurse practitioners in the UK. Background Physical assessment skills practices are embedded in advanced nursing practice roles in the UK. There is little evidence on how these skills are used by advanced nurse practitioners in the community. Design Case study. Methods A qualitative interpretative single‐embedded case study of 22 participants from South of England. A framework method analysed interview data collected by the researcher between March–August 2013. Participants included nurses, doctors, nurse educators and managers. Findings Physical assessment skills education at universities is part of a policy shift to develop a flexible workforce in the UK. Shared physical assessment practices are less to do with role substitution and more about preparing practitioners with skills that are fit for purpose. Competence, capability and performance with physical assessment skills are an expectation of advanced nursing practice. Conclusions These skills are used successfully by community advanced nurse practitioners to deliver a wide range of services in response to changing patient need. The introduction of physical assessment skills education to undergraduate professional preparation would create a firm foundation to develop these skills in postgraduate education. Relevance to clinical practice Physical assessment education prepares nurses with the clinical competencies to carry out healthcare reforms in the UK. Shared sets of clinical assessment competencies between disciplines have better outcomes for patients. Levels of assessment competence can depend on the professional attributes of individual practitioners. Unsupportive learning cultures can hinder professional development of advanced nursing practice.
Suggested Citation
Mary Raleigh & Helen Allan, 2017.
"A qualitative study of advanced nurse practitioners’ use of physical assessment skills in the community: shifting skills across professional boundaries,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 2025-2035, July.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:2025-2035
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13613
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:2025-2035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.