IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p2016-2024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of patient and provider experiences during preoperative care transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ann M Malley
  • Gary J Young

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the issues and challenges of care transitions in the preoperative environment. Background Ineffective transitions play a role in a majority of serious medical errors. There is a paucity of research related to the preoperative arena and the multiple inherent transitions in care that occur there. Design Qualitative descriptive design was used. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted in a 975‐bed academic medical centre. Results A total of 30 providers and 10 preoperative patients participated. Themes that arose were as follows: (1) need for clarity of purpose of preoperative care, (2) care coordination, (3) interprofessional boundaries of care and (4) inadequate time and resources. Conclusion Effective transitions in the preoperative environment require that providers bridge scope of practice barriers to promote good teamwork. Preoperative care that is a product of well‐informed providers and patients can improve the entire perioperative care process and potentially influence postoperative patient outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses are well positioned to bridge the gaps within transitions of care and accordingly affect health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann M Malley & Gary J Young, 2017. "A qualitative study of patient and provider experiences during preoperative care transitions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 2016-2024, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:2016-2024
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13610
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:2016-2024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.