IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p1927-1938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding symptom experiences of muscle tightness from patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Rozina H Bhimani
  • Joseph E Gaugler
  • Carol Skay

Abstract

Aims and objectives The purpose of this study was to determine how patients’ symptom experiences of muscle tightness correlate with examiner assessments. To address this question, we (1) obtained the vocabularies used by patients and examiners to describe muscle tightness, (2) correlated patient‐ reported Visual Analog Scale ratings for locations of muscle tightness on a body diagram and (3) explored the similarities and differences between patient and examiner evaluation of muscle tightness analytically and graphically. Background Symptoms of muscle tightness are common complaints that occur due to musculoskeletal and neuromusculoskeletal injuries. Terms such as muscle tightness are often intermingled with other conditions including muscle tension, muscle spasticity and muscle rigidity. Discrepancies between patients and clinicians understanding of similar symptoms have been reported in the literature. Design A concurrent exploratory mixed methods design was used. Method Fifty‐seven participants (six physical therapists, 51 patients) participated. Participants provided semi‐structured interviews, ratings through Visual Analog Scale and concurrently provided the words used to describe muscle tightness. Patients also provided the location of muscle tightness on a body diagram. Content analysis and hierarchical linear modelling were used for data analysis. Results The patients’ vocabularies contained more sensory and pain experiences when compared to the clinicians’ vocabularies. Examiners and patients ratings were variable (standard deviation >20) and contained discrepancies. Stress played a role in the symptom experience of muscle tightness. Examiners tended to focus on patients’ chief complaints, while patients reported their symptoms from a whole‐body perspective. Conclusions Symptom experiences of muscle tightness can occur with or without pain. Use of complementary therapy and development of an objective tool that accounts for patients’ sensory experiences is warranted. Relevance to clinical Practice Findings from this study indicate that in addition to all other available treatments options, nurses must also educate patients about correct posture alignment, breathing exercises and stress management.

Suggested Citation

  • Rozina H Bhimani & Joseph E Gaugler & Carol Skay, 2017. "Understanding symptom experiences of muscle tightness from patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1927-1938, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1927-1938
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Villanueva & Juan Rabal-Pelay & César Berzosa & Héctor Gutiérrez & Cristina Cimarras-Otal & Belén Lacarcel-Tejero & A. Vanessa Bataller-Cervero, 2020. "Effect of a Long Exercise Program in the Reduction of Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1927-1938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.