IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p1906-1916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do organisational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Øye
  • Frode Fadnes Jacobsen
  • Tone Elin Mekki

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate (1) what kind of restraint is used in three nursing homes in Norway and (2) how staff use restraint under what organisational conditions. Background Restraint use in residents living with dementia in nursing homes is controversial, and at odds with fundamental human rights. Restraint is a matter of hindering residents’ free movement and will by applying either interactional, physical, medical, surveillance or environmental restraint. Previous research has identified use of restraint related to individual resident characteristics such as agitation, aggressiveness and wandering. Design This model is embedded in an overall mixed‐method education intervention design study called Modelling and evaluating evidence‐based continuing education program in dementia care (MEDCED), applying ethnography postintervention to examine the use of restraint in 24 nursing homes in Norway. Method Based on restraint diversity measured in the trial, ethnographic investigation was carried out in three different nursing homes in Norway over a 10‐month period to examine restraint use in relation to organisational constraints. Results Several forms of restraint were observed; among them, interactional restraint was used most frequently. We identified that use of restraint relates to the characteristics of individual residents, such as agitation, aggressiveness and wandering. However, restraint use should also be explained in relation to organisational conditions such as resident mix, staff culture and available human resources. Conclusion A fluctuating and dynamic interplay between different individual and contextual factors determines whether restraint is used – or not in particular situations with residents living with dementia. Relevance to clinical practice Educational initiatives targeting staff to reduce restraint must be sensitive towards fluctuating organisational constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Øye & Frode Fadnes Jacobsen & Tone Elin Mekki, 2017. "Do organisational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1906-1916, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1906-1916
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huizing, Anna R. & Hamers, Jan P.H. & de Jonge, Jan & Candel, Math & Berger, Martijn P.F., 2007. "Organisational determinants of the use of physical restraints: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 924-933, September.
    2. Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2010. "Nursing staff perceptions of the use of physical restraint in institutional care of older people in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3197-3207, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauren M. Robins & Den-Ching A. Lee & J Simon Bell & Velandai Srikanth & Ralph Möhler & Keith D. Hill & Terry P. Haines, 2021. "Definition and Measurement of Physical and Chemical Restraint in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Alba Carrero-Planells & Ana Urrutia-Beaskoa & Cristina Moreno-Mulet, 2021. "The Use of Physical Restraints on Geriatric Patients: Culture and Attitudes among Healthcare Professionals at Intermediate Care Hospitals in Majorca. A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Elisa Ambrosi & Martina Debiasi & Jessica Longhini & Lorenzo Giori & Luisa Saiani & Elisabetta Mezzalira & Federica Canzan, 2021. "Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Acevedo-Nuevo & María Teresa González-Gil & María Concepción Martin-Arribas, 2021. "Physical Restraint Use in Intensive Care Units: Exploring the Decision-Making Process and New Proposals. A Multimethod Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-36, November.
    2. Elisa Ambrosi & Martina Debiasi & Jessica Longhini & Lorenzo Giori & Luisa Saiani & Elisabetta Mezzalira & Federica Canzan, 2021. "Variation of the Occurrence of Physical Restraint Use in the Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Alba Carrero-Planells & Ana Urrutia-Beaskoa & Cristina Moreno-Mulet, 2021. "The Use of Physical Restraints on Geriatric Patients: Culture and Attitudes among Healthcare Professionals at Intermediate Care Hospitals in Majorca. A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Kaisa Kinnunen‐Luovi & Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2014. "Safety incidents involving confused and forgetful older patients in a specialised care setting – analysis of the safety incidents reported to the HaiPro reporting system," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2442-2450, September.
    5. Nina Hynninen & Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2015. "The care of older people with dementia in surgical wards from the point of view of the nursing staff and physicians," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 192-201, January.
    6. Antoinette Barton-Gooden & Pauline E. Dawkins & Joanna Bennett, 2015. "Physical Restraint Usage at a Teaching Hospital," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 73-90, February.
    7. Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2010. "Nursing staff perceptions of the use of physical restraint in institutional care of older people in Finland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3197-3207, November.
    8. Hedi Hofmann & Sabine Hahn, 2014. "Characteristics of nursing home residents and physical restraint: a systematic literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3012-3024, November.
    9. Eun‐Hi Kong & Heeseung Choi & Lois K Evans, 2017. "Staff perceptions of barriers to physical restraint‐reduction in long‐term care: a meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 49-60, January.
    10. Nina Hynninen & Reetta Saarnio & Arja Isola, 2015. "Treatment of older people with dementia in surgical wards from the viewpoints of the patients and close relatives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3691-3699, December.
    11. Fatemeh Eskandari & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Nor Zuraida Zainal & Li Ping Wong, 2017. "Use of physical restraint: Nurses’ knowledge, attitude, intention and practice and influencing factors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4479-4488, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1906-1916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.