Author
Listed:
- Lesley Wilkes
- Michelle Doull
- Harrison Ng Chok
- Gladys Mashingaidze
Abstract
Aims and objectives To develop a tool to measure the influencing nurses’ enjoyment of nursing. Background Enjoyment in the workplace is an influential aspect found to boost work morale, job satisfaction leading to higher work retention which is important in nursing given the availability of nurses in the workforce. This study looks to refine the determinants of enjoyment from nurses in a large metropolitan hospital in western Sydney. Design Quantitative. Methods A 23‐item survey questionnaire was used to ask nurses to rate the determinants that affect their enjoyment of nursing on a five‐point Likert scale. The survey was distributed in a hard copy and online through a hospital‐wide broadcast. Demographic items were also collected. Results A total of 124 responses were received, of which 54 were from online and 70 from hard copy surveys. The data analysis found 16 determinants of enjoyment. Of these, four were perceived by over 80% of the nurses to negatively impact their enjoyment. In contrast, nine items showed a positive effect on enjoyment with educating others, connecting with others, variety of work, doing and sharing with others, supporting others being the most positive (≥89% of responses). Three items were considered neutral: criticism, busy workload and changing policies. Conclusions This study has added to the growing evidence on nurse enjoyment and its effects on job satisfaction. Nurses enjoy caring for patients and also find enjoyment and satisfaction in teaching others to care as well as socially connecting. Relevance to clinical practice Enjoyment seems to be one of the main reasons nurses continue to stay in nursing even though the system and people are not always supportive, encouraging or conducive to career development.
Suggested Citation
Lesley Wilkes & Michelle Doull & Harrison Ng Chok & Gladys Mashingaidze, 2017.
"Developing a tool to measure the factors influencing nurses’ enjoyment of nursing,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1854-1860, July.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1854-1860
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13483
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1854-1860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.