IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i11-12p1458-1472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of the effectiveness of self‐management interventions for people with type 2 diabetes after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Mu'ath Ibrahim Tanash
  • Donna Fitzsimons
  • Vivien Coates
  • Christi Deaton

Abstract

Background Type 2 diabetes is highly prevalent in patients with acute coronary syndrome and impacts negatively on health outcomes and self‐management. Both conditions share similar risk factors. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of combined interventions to promote self‐management behaviour for people with diabetes and cardiac problems. Identifying critical features of successful interventions will inform future integrated self‐management programmes for patients with both conditions. Objectives To assess the evidence on the effectiveness of existing interventions to promote self‐management behaviour for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and type 2 diabetes in secondary care settings and postdischarge. Design We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library and AMED for randomised controlled trials published between January 2005–December 2014. The search was performed using the following search terms of ‘acute coronary syndrome’, ‘type 2 diabetes’ and ‘self‐management intervention’ and their substitutes combined. Results Of 4275 articles that were retrieved, only four trials met all the inclusion criteria (population, intervention, comparison and outcome) and were analysed. Overall, the results show that providing combined interventions for patients with both conditions including educational sessions supported by multimedia or telecommunication technologies was partially successful in promoting self‐management behaviours. Implementation of these combined interventions during patient's hospitalisation and postdischarge was feasible. Intervention group subjects reported a significant improvement in self‐efficacy, level of knowledge, glycated haemoglobin, blood pressure and fasting glucose test. However, there are many threats have been noticed around internal validity of included studies that could compromise the conclusions drawn. Conclusion With limited research in this area, there was no final evidence to support effectiveness of combined interventions to promote self‐management behaviour for patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. Sufficiently powered, good quality, well‐conducted and reported randomised controlled trials are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Mu'ath Ibrahim Tanash & Donna Fitzsimons & Vivien Coates & Christi Deaton, 2017. "An evaluation of the effectiveness of self‐management interventions for people with type 2 diabetes after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1458-1472, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1458-1472
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13487
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1458-1472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.