IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i1-2p33-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scoping review of the literature on nursing practices with persons seeking care for sexually transmitted infections

Author

Listed:
  • Vicky Bungay
  • Ingrid Handlovsky
  • J Craig Phillips
  • Cheryl Prescott

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine existing research literature to ascertain what is known about nursing practice in sexually transmitted infection care and identify promising research trends and limitations. Background Sexually transmitted infections continue to be a significant public health concern with more than 357 million new cases occurring annually worldwide. Nurses are vital for the prevention and care of those affected by sexually transmitted infections. As nursing scope of practice is evolving, there is an urgent need to develop a baseline understanding of the state of nursing knowledge in sexually transmitted infection care. Design Nurse researchers and policy and practice experts conducted a scoping review of primary research using Arksey and O'Malley's five‐step methodological framework. Methods Primary research literature published between 2000–2014 was searched. Seventeen full‐text papers were thematically analysed. Electronic charts were created for data coding and extraction. Results The research literature in nursing and sexually transmitted infection care is heterogeneous in topic, method and populations investigated. Sexually transmitted infection care is undertaken by nurses in diverse settings and roles including nurse practitioners and public health, school and emergency room nurses. Three themes that illustrate the main focus of current literature were identified: (1) screening, (2) health education and counselling and (3) scope of nursing practice. Inconsistencies in nursing practice activities in sexually transmitted infection care were noted. Many nurses are not working to their full scope of practice. Conclusions The research in sexually transmitted infection nursing practice is limited. Further research is needed to investigate the context of practice and patient care experiences; to design and test interventions to support nurses working to full scope of practice; and to improve the conceptualisation of nursing in sexually transmitted infection care. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses are effectively improving health outcomes among people affected by sexually transmitted infections; however, not working to the full scope of practice could limit our capacity to fully meet patient care needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicky Bungay & Ingrid Handlovsky & J Craig Phillips & Cheryl Prescott, 2017. "A scoping review of the literature on nursing practices with persons seeking care for sexually transmitted infections," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 33-48, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:33-48
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13561
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leah East & Debra Jackson & Louise O’Brien & Kathleen Peters, 2011. "Healthcare experiences of women who have been diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(15‐16), pages 2259-2265, August.
    2. Vicky Bungay & Cindy L. Masaro & Mark Gilbert, 2014. "Examining the scope of public health nursing practice in sexually transmitted infection prevention and management: what do nurses do?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3274-3285, November.
    3. Leah East & Marie Hutchinson, 2013. "Moving beyond the therapeutic relationship: a selective review of intimacy in the sexual health encounter in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3568-3576, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Pascale Blakey & Helen Aveyard, 2017. "Student nurses’ competence in sexual health care: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3906-3916, December.
    2. Christine Cassidy & Lisa Goldberg & Megan Aston, 2016. "The application of a feminist poststructural framework in nursing practice for addressing young women's sexual health," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2378-2386, August.
    3. Jackson, Louise J. & Roberts, Tracy E., 2015. "Conceptualising quality of life outcomes for women participating in testing for sexually transmitted infections: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 162-170.
    4. Su‐Ching Sung & Huey‐Hwa Jiang & Ru‐Rong Chen & Jian‐Kang Chao, 2016. "Bridging the gap in sexual healthcare in nursing practice: implementing a sexual healthcare training programme to improve outcomes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2989-3000, October.
    5. Kicki Klaeson & Lina Hovlin & Hanna Guvå & Anna Kjellsdotter, 2017. "Sexual health in primary health care – a qualitative study of nurses’ experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1545-1554, June.
    6. Kath Peters & Antoinette Cotton, 2015. "Barriers to breast cancer screening in Australia: experiences of women with physical disabilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 563-572, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:33-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.