IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i1-2p266-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowerment in nurse leader groups in middle management: a quantitative comparative investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Spencer
  • Susan McLaren

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim was to investigate structural empowerment in nurse leaders in middle management positions. Objectives were to determine levels of empowerment of nurse leaders and to compare levels of empowerment between nurse leader groups. Background Access to formal and informal power, opportunity, resources, information and support are determinants of structural empowerment. Empowerment of nurse leaders in middle management positions is vital given their roles in enabling nursing teams to deliver high‐quality care, benefitting both patient and workforce outcomes. Design Quantitative component of a mixed methods study using survey principles. Methods The Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire II was distributed to the total population (n = 517) of nurse leaders in an NHS Foundation Trust in England. Nurse leader groups comprised unit leaders (sisters, matrons) and senior staff nurses. Quantitative data entered on spss v 17/18, were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results Overall, the unit response rate was 44·1% (n = 228). Levels of total and global empowerment were moderate and moderate to high respectively. Groups did not differ significantly on these parameters or on five elements of total empowerment, but significantly higher scores were found for unit leaders’ access to information. Significantly higher scores were found for senior staff nurses on selected aspects of informal power and access to resources, but scores were significantly lower than unit leaders for components of support. Conclusions A moderately empowered population of nurse leaders differed in relation to access to information, aspects of support, resources and informal power, reflecting differences in roles, spheres of responsibility, hierarchical position and the constraints on empowerment imposed on unit leaders by financial and resource pressures. Relevance to clinical practice Empowerment of nurse leaders in middle management is vital in enabling nursing teams to deliver high‐quality care. Roles, spheres of responsibility, hierarchical position and constraints imposed by financial and resource pressures influence nurse leader empowerment. Administrative support is needed to sustain practice engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Spencer & Susan McLaren, 2017. "Empowerment in nurse leader groups in middle management: a quantitative comparative investigation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 266-279, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:266-279
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13426
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerri‐ann Hughes & Jennifer Barbara Carryer & Jill White, 2015. "Structural positioning of nurse leaders and empowerment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2125-2132, August.
    2. Ann Bradshaw, 2010. "Is the ward sister role still relevant to the quality of patient care? A critical examination of the ward sister role past and present," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3555-3563, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natasha Phillips & Karen Norman, 2020. "A case study of frontline nurse leadership informed by complex responsive processes of relating," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2181-2195, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:266-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.