IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i1-2p133-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimising peripheral venous catheter usage in the general inpatient ward: a prospective observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Hua Grace Tan
  • Wai Ling Stephanie Tai
  • Crystal Sim
  • Hui Leng Isabel Ng

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate current practices in managing peripheral venous catheters through catheter lifespan, reasons for removal and identifying potential predictors of catheter complications. Background Peripheral venous catheter insertion is a common minimally invasive procedure performed during patient admission. Current routine replacement of catheters may not be required in the light of recent evidence. Design A prospective observational study was carried out in April 2013. Methods One hundred patients were selected by systematic sampling. Ward nurses with support from three research nurses collected data for two weeks, ceasing earlier if patient no longer required venous catheters, was discharged, passed on or was transferred to a nongeneral ward setting. Analysis for potential predictors was carried out using random‐effects model. Results A total of 218 catheters were sampled, with a median catheter lifespan of 2·0 days. Half the catheters were removed because of complications with only 13 catheter removals due to phlebitis (grade 1+) in the first three days. Percentage of catheters removed due to complications also decreased as indwelling time increased. Twenty‐three catheters (8·3%) could also have been saved as they were rendered ‘not required/discharge’ on day 1. Only insertion on the outer forearm was found to be associated with the likelihood of developing venous catheter complications. Conclusions Phlebitis rates in our setting are comparable to other published studies with all phlebitis cases occurring before the third day. The median catheter lifespan of two days is shorter than routine three‐day replacement, which warrants an urgent review of current insertion and maintenance practices in our local setting. Relevance to clinical practice Changing practice from routine replacement to clinically indicated has benefits to nurses and patients in terms of manpower time and costs. However, an effort to maximise peripheral catheter lifespan is necessary through daily vigilant catheter care and regular audits of practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Hua Grace Tan & Wai Ling Stephanie Tai & Crystal Sim & Hui Leng Isabel Ng, 2017. "Optimising peripheral venous catheter usage in the general inpatient ward: a prospective observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 133-139, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:133-139
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dragana Simin & Dragana Milutinović & Vesna Turkulov & Snežana Brkić, 2019. "Incidence, severity and risk factors of peripheral intravenous cannula‐induced complications: An observational prospective study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1585-1599, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:1-2:p:133-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.