IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i9-10p1426-1434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting to know the person behind the illness – the significance of interacting with patients hospitalised in forensic psychiatric settings

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Salzmann‐Erikson
  • Cecilia Rydlo
  • Lena Wiklund Gustin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe what nurses want to accomplish in relationships with patients who are hospitalised in forensic psychiatric settings. Background Relationships between staff and patients in forensic psychiatric settings should be grounded in trust and confidence, and the patients need opportunities for emotional reconciliation. However, relationships can be challenging for nurses, who sometimes distance themselves from patients’ expressions of suffering. The role of forensic mental health nurses is nebulous, as are the prescriptives and the implementation of nursing practices. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Methods In‐depth interviews with five nurses who all work in forensic psychiatric settings. Results We present a descriptive analysis of what nurses want to accomplish in relationships with patients who are hospitalised in forensic psychiatric settings. The results are presented in two main categories: (1) getting to know the person behind the illness and (2) making a difference. Conclusion Care in forensic psychiatry needs to shift towards a more long‐term view of the role of nursing, focusing less on the traditional and stereotypical identity of the productive nurse and more on the care given when nurses slow down and take the time to see the patients as individuals. Establishing trusting relationships with patients in forensic psychiatric settings is viewed as a less oppressive way to control patients and guide them in directions that are preferable for the nurses and for the society. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses may use simple strategies in their daily practice such as sitting on the sofa with patients to establish trust. We stress that nurses should abandon policing roles and custodial activities in favour of guiding principles that promote individual recovery, treatment and health‐promoting care.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Salzmann‐Erikson & Cecilia Rydlo & Lena Wiklund Gustin, 2016. "Getting to know the person behind the illness – the significance of interacting with patients hospitalised in forensic psychiatric settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1426-1434, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1426-1434
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13252
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Remar A. Mangaoil & Kristin Cleverley & Elizabeth Peter, 2020. "Immediate Staff Debriefing Following Seclusion or Restraint Use in Inpatient Mental Health Settings: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 479-495, September.
    2. Helén Olsson & Lisbeth Kristiansen, 2017. "Violence Risk Assessment in Forensic Nurses’ Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Interview Study," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 1-56, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1426-1434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.