Author
Listed:
- Rose Chapman
- Kaye Robyn Ogle
- Catherine Martin
- Asheq Rahman
- Brian McKenna
- Jakqui Barnfield
Abstract
Aims and objectives To explore emergency nurses perceptions of the use of manual restraint. Background Manual restraint of patients has historically been an accepted practice, though little is known about the use of manual restraint in general hospitals. Design A qualitative, descriptive, exploratory, study was undertaken. Method Fifteen semi‐structured interviews with emergency nurses were completed. Data were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis procedures. Results The following themes were identified: ‘part of the job’, ‘reasons for manual restraint’, ‘restraint techniques’, ‘consequences’ and ‘lack of documentation’. Manual restraint occurred frequently each shift and most were not documented. This may be due to nurse's perceptions that manually restraining a patient did not comprise formal restraint and was the only option. Nurses used manual restraint to manage patients who were violent and aggressive or to perform procedures. However, they reported a lack of education and training in manual restraint. Nurses identified several consequences for the patient, staff and the organisation as a result of these events including psychological and physical injuries. Conclusions Empirical research of prevalence and issues surrounding manual restraint events is required to inform health care organisations and government to develop, implement and evaluate appropriate policies and strategies to ensure safety of patients and staff. The employment of peer support workers and professionals with expertise in mental health and dementia may aid in the reduction of manual restraint events and improve care of all patients within the Emergency Department. Research on manual restraint in health settings is also needed. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses need to be aware that manual restraint is not just an accepted part of their work, but is a strategy of last resort that should be documented. Organisations must implement standardised educational programmes for nurses together with policies and processes to monitor and evaluate manual restraint events.
Suggested Citation
Rose Chapman & Kaye Robyn Ogle & Catherine Martin & Asheq Rahman & Brian McKenna & Jakqui Barnfield, 2016.
"Australian nurses' perceptions of the use of manual restraint in the Emergency Department: a qualitative perspective,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1273-1281, May.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1273-1281
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13159
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1273-1281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.