Author
Listed:
- Cynthia S Jacelon
- Molly A Gibbs
- John VE Ridgway
Abstract
Aims and objectives The purpose of this scoping review of literature is to explore the types of computer‐based systems used for self‐management of chronic disease, the goals and success of these systems, the value added by technology integration and the target audience for these systems. Background Technology is changing the way health care is provided and the way that individuals manage their health. Individuals with chronic diseases are now able to use computer‐based systems to self‐manage their health. These systems have the ability to remind users of daily activities, and to help them recognise when symptoms are worsening and intervention is indicated. However, there are many questions about the types of systems available, the goals of these systems and the success with which individuals with chronic illness are using them. Design This is a scoping review in which the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases were searched. A total of 303 articles were reviewed, 89 articles were read in‐depth and 30 were included in the scoping review. The Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition model was used to evaluate the value added by the technology integration. Findings Research on technology for self‐management was conducted in 13 countries. Data analysis identified five kinds of platforms on which the systems were based, some systems were focused on a specific disease management processes, others were not. Conclusions For individuals to effectively use systems to maintain maximum wellness, the systems must have a strong component of self‐management and provide the user with meaningful information regarding their health states. Relevance to clinical practice Clinicians should choose systems for their clients based on the design, components and goals of the systems.
Suggested Citation
Cynthia S Jacelon & Molly A Gibbs & John VE Ridgway, 2016.
"Computer technology for self‐management: a scoping review,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1179-1192, May.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1179-1192
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13221
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:9-10:p:1179-1192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.