IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p983-991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Refusal to participate in heart failure studies: do age and gender matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Jordan M Harrison
  • Miyeon Jung
  • Terry A Lennie
  • Debra K Moser
  • Dean G Smith
  • Sandra B Dunbar
  • David L Ronis
  • Todd M Koelling
  • Bruno Giordani
  • Penny L Riley
  • Susan J Pressler

Abstract

Aims and objectives The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate reasons heart failure patients decline study participation, to inform interventions to improve enrollment. Background Failure to enrol older heart failure patients (age > 65) and women in studies may lead to sampling bias, threatening study validity. Design This study was a retrospective analysis of refusal data from four heart failure studies that enrolled 788 patients in four states. Methods Chi‐Square and a pooled t‐test were computed to analyse refusal data (n = 300) obtained from heart failure patients who were invited to participate in one of the four studies but declined. Results Refusal reasons from 300 patients (66% men, mean age 65·33) included: not interested (n = 163), too busy (n = 64), travel burden (n = 50), too sick (n = 38), family problems (n = 14), too much commitment (n = 13) and privacy concerns (n = 4). Chi‐Square analyses showed no differences in frequency of reasons (p > 0·05) between men and women. Patients who refused were older, on average, than study participants. Conclusions Some reasons were patient‐dependent; others were study‐dependent. With ‘not interested’ as the most common reason, cited by over 50% of patients who declined, recruitment measures should be targeted at stimulating patients’ interest. Additional efforts may be needed to recruit older participants. However, reasons for refusal were consistent regardless of gender. Relevance to clinical practice Heart failure researchers should proactively approach a greater proportion of women and patients over age 65. With no gender differences in type of reasons for refusal, similar recruitment strategies can be used for men and women. However, enrolment of a representative proportion of women in heart failure studies has proven elusive and may require significant effort from researchers. Employing strategies to stimulate interest in studies is essential for recruiting heart failure patients, who overwhelmingly cited lack of interest as the top reason for refusal.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordan M Harrison & Miyeon Jung & Terry A Lennie & Debra K Moser & Dean G Smith & Sandra B Dunbar & David L Ronis & Todd M Koelling & Bruno Giordani & Penny L Riley & Susan J Pressler, 2016. "Refusal to participate in heart failure studies: do age and gender matter?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 983-991, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:983-991
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13135
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:983-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.