IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p1112-1119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evaluation of dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection sites: a cadaver study

Author

Listed:
  • Halise Coskun
  • Cenk Kilic
  • Cicek Senture

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to measure the thickness of the muscles in the dorsogluteal and the ventrogluteal injection sites and to determine which injection site is farther away from the neurovascular structures. Background Although the dorsogluteal region is frequently used for intramuscular injections, the ventrogluteal region is suggested as a more secure injection site due to its distance to the neurovascular structures. However, there are no measurements regarding the distances of these structures. Due to this reason, the distance between these injection sites and the neurovascular structures should be measured. Design This study is a descriptive study that used cadavers to measure the distance between the injection sites and the neurovascular structures. Methods The study was conducted on 29 cadavers fixed with 10% formalin. The needle was advanced until reaching its end point. A 1·5‐inch needle was used for the injections in both regions. The gluteal region was dissected. Parameters were measured with a digital vernier calliper. Data Analysis was performed using spss and the Wilcoxon Signed‐Rank Test was used to examine differences among measurements from the two injection regions. Data were collected between February and May 2014. Results Sum of the thickness of the muscles is greater in the dorsogluteal region. The ventrogluteal region is farther than the dorsogluteal region from neurovascular structures. For the ventrogluteal injection administered from the same side, total thickness of the muscle was 22·22 ± 5 mm, distance to the superior gluteal artery was 13·87 ± 16 mm and distance to the superior gluteal nerve was 11·82 ± 14 mm. For the dorsogluteal injection, total thickness of the muscle was 28·35 ± 7 mm, distance to the superior gluteal artery was 6·83 ± 9 mm, and distance to the superior gluteal nerve was 5·67 ± 9 mm. Conclusion Intramuscular injections must be based on an individual clinical assessment of each patient. Relevance to clinical practice The ventrogluteal region is preferred as the first‐choice injection site. A needle of recommended length should be used to reach the target muscle.

Suggested Citation

  • Halise Coskun & Cenk Kilic & Cicek Senture, 2016. "The evaluation of dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection sites: a cadaver study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1112-1119, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1112-1119
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13171
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1112-1119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.