IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p1095-1100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of oxygen saturation values in different body positions in healthy individuals

Author

Listed:
  • Burcu Ceylan
  • Leyla Khorshid
  • Ülkü Yapucu Güneş
  • Ayten Zaybak

Abstract

Aims and objectives The research was conducted to evaluate oxygen saturation values measured in healthy individuals in different body positions. Background Changes in position affect ventilation‐perfusion rates, oxygen transport and lung volume in normal lungs. There have been few studies and not enough information about which positioning of a healthy individual can increase oxygenation. Design A descriptive study. Methods A sample of 103 healthy individuals with no chronic disease, anaemia or pain was included in the research. Individuals were positioned in five different positions: sitting upright, supine position, prone position, lying on the left side and lying on the right side. Oxygen saturation and pulse rates were then measured and recorded after the individuals held each position for ten minutes. Results It was found that the average oxygen saturation value when measured while sitting in an upright position in a chair was significantly higher than that measured when the individual was lying on the right or left side of the body. Oxygen saturation values measured in the five different body positions were significantly higher in women, in individuals below the age of 35, in those with Body Mass Indexes of below 25 kg/m2, and in nonsmokers. Conclusion All of the oxygen saturation values measured in the five different body positions were in the normal range. Although oxygen saturation values were within the normal range in the five different body positions, post hoc analysis showed that the best oxygenation was in the ‘sitting upright’ position while the lowest oxygenation was in the supine position. Relevance to clinical practice Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that the differences among oxygen saturation values according to the different body positions were statistically significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Burcu Ceylan & Leyla Khorshid & Ülkü Yapucu Güneş & Ayten Zaybak, 2016. "Evaluation of oxygen saturation values in different body positions in healthy individuals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1095-1100, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1095-1100
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13189
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1095-1100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.