IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i7-8p1025-1034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development and psychometric analysis of the Chinese HIV‐Related Fatigue Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Su‐Yin Li
  • Hua‐Shan Wu
  • Julie Barroso

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop a Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale and examine its reliability and validity. Background Fatigue is found in more than 70% of people infected with human immunodeficiency virus. However, a scale to assess fatigue in human immunodeficiency virus–positive people has not yet been developed for use in Chinese‐speaking countries. Design A methodologic study involving instrument development and psychometric evaluation was used. Methods The human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale was examined through a two‐step procedure: (1) translation and back translation and (2) psychometric analysis. A sample of 142 human immunodeficiency virus–positive patients was recruited from the Infectious Disease Outpatient Clinic in central Taiwan. Their fatigue data were analysed with Cronbach's α for internal consistency. Two weeks later, the data of a random sample of 28 patients from the original 142 were analysed for test–retest reliability. The correlation between the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment‐Human Immunodeficiency Virus and the Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus‐related Fatigue Scale was analysed for concurrent validity. The Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale scores of human immunodeficiency virus–positive patients with highly active antiretroviral therapy and those without were compared to demonstrate construct validity. Results The internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale were 0·97 and 0·686, respectively. In regard to concurrent validity, a negative correlation was found between the scores of the Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment‐Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Additionally, the Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale could be used to effectively distinguish fatigue differences between the human immunodeficiency virus–positive patients with highly active antiretroviral therapy and those without. Conclusions The Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale presents good reliability and validity through a robust psychometric analysis. This scale can be appropriately applied to human immunodeficiency virus–positive patients by clinical staff and case managers in Chinese‐speaking countries. Relevance to clinical practice The Chinese version of the human immunodeficiency virus–related Fatigue Scale is an effective and comprehensive tool that can help clinical professionals measure the frequency, strength and impact on the quality of life of fatigue in Chinese human immunodeficiency virus–positive patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Su‐Yin Li & Hua‐Shan Wu & Julie Barroso, 2016. "The development and psychometric analysis of the Chinese HIV‐Related Fatigue Scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1025-1034, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1025-1034
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13151
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:7-8:p:1025-1034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.