Author
Listed:
- Nicole Kneflin
- Lucy O'Quinn
- Gina Geigle
- Brenda Mott
- Dawn Nebrig
- Jennifer Munafo
Abstract
Aims and objectives To describe shared governance in action through the example of one paediatric institution's decision to institute daily chlorhexidine bathing. Background Shared governance processes are discussed extensively in the literature; however, implementation of the processes can be challenging. Recently nurses at one paediatric hospital were involved in a hospital‐wide practice change where the theoretical approach of shared governance was actualised. Several questions arose from direct care nurses about unwarranted variations in bathing practices across settings and whether bathing standardisation could address the recent increase in central line‐associated bloodstream infections. Shared governance council members identified daily chlorhexidine bathing as a potential intervention to standardise bathing across the hospital and to decrease infection rates. At this time, chlorhexidine bathing had been widely adopted in adult hospitals but was less commonly practiced in paediatric institutions. Design This is a position paper describing the use of shared governance to make a house‐wide practice decision and positively impact patient outcomes. Method Inquiry Council members conducted a systematic evidence search on best practices around chlorhexidine bathing. This evidence was used in Practice Council discussions to standardise house‐wide practice. Once consensus was achieved, council members collaborated with Education Council to ensure understanding, competency, and the adoption and sustainment of the practice change. Conclusions Patients with central lines are at decreased risk for acquiring a central line‐associated blood stream infection due, in part, to the change in nursing practice to include daily chlorhexidine bathing. The shared governance structure was the vehicle through which this practice was vetted and instituted. Relevance to clinical practice This paper provides a real‐life example of leveraging shared governance structures and the direct care nurse leaders within the councils when an organisation faces critical needs in patient care.
Suggested Citation
Nicole Kneflin & Lucy O'Quinn & Gina Geigle & Brenda Mott & Dawn Nebrig & Jennifer Munafo, 2016.
"Direct care nurses on the shared governance journey towards positive patient outcomes,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 875-882, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:875-882
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13114
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:875-882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.