IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i5-6p619-630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Processes in healthcare teams that include nurse practitioners: what do patients and families perceive to be effective?

Author

Listed:
  • Kelley Kilpatrick
  • Mira Jabbour
  • Chantal Fortin

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore patient and family perceptions of team effectiveness of teams those include nurse practitioners in acute and primary care. Background Nurse practitioners provide safe and effective care. Patients are satisfied with the care provided by nurse practitioners. Research examining patient and family perceptions of team effectiveness following the implementation of nurse practitioners in teams is lacking. Design A descriptive qualitative design was used. Methods We used purposeful sampling to identify participants in four clinical specialties. We collected data from March 2014–January 2015 using semi‐structured interviews and demographic questionnaires. Content analysis was used. Descriptive statistics were generated. Results Participants (n = 49) believed that the teams were more effective after the implementation of a nurse practitioner and this was important to them. They described processes that teams with nurse practitioners used to effectively provide care. These processes included improved communication, involvement in decision‐making, cohesion, care coordination, problem‐solving, and a focus on the needs of patients and families. Participants highlighted the importance of interpersonal team dynamics. A human approach, trust, being open to discussion, listening to patient and family concerns and respect were particularly valued by participants. Different processes emerged as priorities when data were examined by speciality. However, communication, trust and taking the time to provide care were the most important processes. Conclusion The study provides new insights into the views of patients and families and micro‐level processes in teams with nurse practitioners. The relative importance of each process varied according to the patient's health condition. Patients and providers identified similar team processes. Future research is needed to identify how team processes influence care outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice The findings can support patients, clinicians and decision‐makers to determine the processes to focus on to promote effective team functioning, and involve patients and families as team members.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelley Kilpatrick & Mira Jabbour & Chantal Fortin, 2016. "Processes in healthcare teams that include nurse practitioners: what do patients and families perceive to be effective?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 619-630, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:619-630
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelley Kilpatrick, 2013. "How do nurse practitioners in acute care affect perceptions of team effectiveness?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(17-18), pages 2636-2647, September.
    2. Pettigrew, Andrew M., 1997. "What is a processual analysis?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 337-348, December.
    3. Marie-Laure Delamaire & Gaétan Lafortune, 2010. "Nurses in Advanced Roles: A Description and Evaluation of Experiences in 12 Developed Countries," OECD Health Working Papers 54, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabelle Brault & Kelley Kilpatrick & Danielle D’Amour & Damien Contandriopoulos & Véronique Chouinard & Carl-Ardy Dubois & Mélanie Perroux & Marie-Dominique Beaulieu, 2014. "Role Clarification Processes for Better Integration of Nurse Practitioners into Primary Healthcare Teams: A Multiple-Case Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, December.
    2. Ruth Martin‐Misener & Faith Donald & Abigail Wickson‐Griffiths & Noori Akhtar‐Danesh & Jenny Ploeg & Kevin Brazil & Sharon Kaasalainen & Carrie McAiney & Nancy Carter & Lori Schindel Martin & Esther S, 2015. "A mixed methods study of the work patterns of full‐time nurse practitioners in nursing homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(9-10), pages 1327-1337, May.
    3. Nii Antiaye Addy & Arash Shaban-Nejad & David L. Buckeridge & Laurette Dubé, 2015. "An Innovative Approach to Addressing Childhood Obesity: A Knowledge-Based Infrastructure for Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Decision-Making in Quebec, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    4. van Wijk, R.A.J.L. & van den Bosch, F.A.J., 2000. "Transition Processes Towards Internal Networks," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2000-22-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    6. Ugonna, Dr Charity Udodirim & Ochieng, Prof Edward G. & Zuofa, Dr Tarila, 2021. "Augmenting the delivery of public research and development projects in developing countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Ellegaard, Chris & Andersen, Poul Houman, 2015. "The process of resolving severe conflict in buyer–supplier relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 457-470.
    8. Per Engelseth & Remiguisz Kozlowski & Karolina Kamecka & Lukasz Gawinski & Richard Glavee-Geo, 2021. "Framing Sustainable Healthcare Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Lippert, Inge, 2008. "Perspektivenverschiebungen in der Corporate Governance: Neuere Ansätze und Studien der Corporate-Governance-Forschung," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2008-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Cate Watson & Gary Husband & Aileen Ireland, 2021. "Opening the ‘black box’: what does observational research reveal about processes and practices of governing?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 189-221, March.
    11. Catherine Welch & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, 2022. "Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 4-26, February.
    12. Vieru, Dragos & Rivard, Suzanne, 2014. "Organizational identity challenges in a post-merger context: A case study of an information system implementation project," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 381-386.
    13. Achcaoucaou, Fariza & Miravitlles, Paloma & León-Darder, Fidel, 2014. "Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 76-90.
    14. Poul Houman Andersen & Lars Esbjerg, 2020. "Weaving a strategy for a base‐of‐the‐pyramid market: The case of Grundfos LIFELINK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3687-3701, December.
    15. Bouckenooghe, Dave & Schwarz, Gavin M. & Kanar, Adam & Sanders, Karin, 2021. "Revisiting research on attitudes toward organizational change: Bibliometric analysis and content facet analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 137-148.
    16. Valérie-Inès de La Ville, 2000. "La recherche idiographique en management stratégique: une pratique en quête de méthode?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 3(3), pages 73-99, September.
    17. Per Davidsson & Jan Henrik Gruenhagen, 2021. "Fulfilling the Process Promise: A Review and Agenda for New Venture Creation Process Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1083-1118, September.
    18. Catrin Evans & Ruth Pearce & Sarah Greaves & Holly Blake, 2020. "Advanced Clinical Practitioners in Primary Care in the UK: A Qualitative Study of Workforce Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Frans Sengers & Alexander Peine, 2021. "Innovation Pathways for Age-Friendly Homes in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Mary Ryder & Elisabeth Jacob & Joyce Hendricks, 2019. "An inductive qualitative approach to explore Nurse Practitioners views on leadership and research: An international perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2644-2658, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:619-630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.