IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i3-4p472-482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A feasibility and efficacy randomised controlled trial of swaddling for controlling procedural pain in preterm infants

Author

Listed:
  • Lai Ping Ho
  • Simone SM Ho
  • Doris YP Leung
  • Winnie KW So
  • Carmen WH Chan

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of swaddling to control procedural pain among preterm infants. Background Swaddling has been recommended for controlling neonatal pain. However, the feasibility for use is uncertain and insufficient evidence is available among preterm infants. Design A two‐arm randomised controlled trial with repeated measures. Method The study was conducted in a 21‐bed neonatal intensive care unit of a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Preterm infants who required heelstick procedure were eligible. Fifty‐four preterm infants between 30–37 gestational weeks were randomly assigned to swaddling (n = 27) and control (standard care, n = 27) groups. Pain assessment was performed pre, during, immediate, two, four, six and eight minutes after heelstick procedure using the Premature Infant Pain Profile. Results The mean Premature Infant Pain Profile scores were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group during, immediate, two, four, and six minutes after the heelstick procedure. The mean changes of heart rate and oxygen saturation in the intervention group were significantly lower than that of the control group at all measured time points. Notably, the swaddled infants quickly resumed to the baseline level at two minutes whereas the control group reached the stable state at an extended period of six minutes. Conclusion The findings show that swaddling is feasible and efficacious in controlling pain for heelstick procedure among preterm infants. No adverse effects were observed. Relevance to clinical practice This article presents the feasibility and efficacy of swaddling as a non‐pharmacological and non‐invasive intervention to relieve pain during the heelstick procedures among preterm infants. Swaddling can contribute to control minor procedural pain in neonates as one of the simple, safe, cost effective, humanistic and natural analgesia alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Lai Ping Ho & Simone SM Ho & Doris YP Leung & Winnie KW So & Carmen WH Chan, 2016. "A feasibility and efficacy randomised controlled trial of swaddling for controlling procedural pain in preterm infants," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 472-482, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:3-4:p:472-482
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13075
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:3-4:p:472-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.