IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i23-24p3597-3604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk behaviours of an interrelated syphilis‐infected sexual network of men who have sex with men

Author

Listed:
  • Richie Diesterheft
  • John P Brady
  • Mona Shattell

Abstract

Aims and objectives We examined the risk behaviours in an interrelated sexual network of 33 syphilis‐infected men who have sex with men on the use of condoms, substances and websites to meet sexual partners. Our study used a descriptive exploratory design to investigate co‐occurring high‐risk behaviours in this interrelated sexual network to inform future health interventions and research directions. Background Although the risk behaviours for human immunodeficiency virus transmission in men who have sex with men have been studied, few have studied the high‐risk population of men who already have syphilis, and even fewer have studied the risk behaviours in sexual networks of syphilis‐infected men who have sex with men who were identified using contact tracing. Design/Methods The data were collected from semi‐structured, individual interviews at a not‐for‐profit lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health centre in a large city in the Midwestern USA. Results Inconsistent condom use was substantial during both insertive (92%) and receptive (88%) anal intercourse. Most participants (97%) reported using one or more substances prior to or during anal intercourse, and Internet websites were the most common place to meet sexual partners (88%). Conclusions High‐risk behaviours were significant within this syphilis‐infected sexual network of men who have sex with men. The majority of our 33 participants were non‐Hispanic Whites (n = 27, 82%), possessed a baccalaureate degree or higher (n = 23, 70%), and actively sought out unprotected anal intercourse [21 participants (64%) used BareBackRT.com, a website to seek out unprotected anal intercourse]. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses should be more informed about the risk factors of a high‐risk sexual network of syphilis‐infected men who have sex with men. Interrelated sexual networks have high levels of similarity among participants’ high‐risk behaviours; contact tracing may be used to identify individual participants for relevant risk‐reduction interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Richie Diesterheft & John P Brady & Mona Shattell, 2016. "Risk behaviours of an interrelated syphilis‐infected sexual network of men who have sex with men," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(23-24), pages 3597-3604, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:23-24:p:3597-3604
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13209
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13209?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ng, R.A.C. & Samuel, M.C. & Lo, T. & Bernstein, K.T. & Aynalem, G. & Klausner, J.D. & Bolan, G., 2013. "Sex, drugs (methamphetamines), and the internet: Increasing syphilis among men who have sex with men in California, 2004-2008," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(8), pages 1450-1456.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:23-24:p:3597-3604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.