IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i21-22p3219-3228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rhetoric or reality? What nurse practitioners do to provide self‐management support in outpatient clinics: an ethnographic study

Author

Listed:
  • Ada J ter Maten‐Speksnijder
  • Jolanda Dwarswaard
  • Pauline L Meurs
  • AnneLoes van Staa

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe how nurse practitioners enact their role in outpatient consultations, and how this compares to their perception of their responsibility for patients with chronic conditions. Background Nurse practitioners working with patients with chronic conditions seek to support them in self‐managing their diseases. Design An ethnographic study. Methods Episodic participant observations (in total 48 hours) were carried out combined with formal interviews. The study population consisted of a purposive sample of nurse practitioners working in five outpatient clinics related to chronic care in one university medical centre in the Netherlands. Two different types of clinics were selected, namely (1) for patients with episodic flare‐ups and (2) for patients with diseases requiring life‐saving procedures. Results The nurse practitioners perceived the monitoring of patients’ treatment as their main professional responsibility. Four monitoring strategies could be distinguished: ‘assessing health conditions’, ‘connecting with patients’, ‘prioritising treatment in daily living’ and ‘educating patients’. Conclusion While nurse practitioners considered building a relationship with their patients of utmost importance, their consultations were mostly based on a conventional medical model of medical history taking. Little attention was paid to the social, psychological and behavioural dimensions of illness. Nurse practitioners in this study seemed quite successful in their extension into medical territory, but moving patients’ illness perceptions to the background was not conducive to self‐management support. Relevance to clinical practice By their medical subspecialty expertise, nurse practitioners have a major role in the longitudinal process of the management of chronic diseases’ treatment. Supporting patients to reduce the impact of the disease and its complications requires nurse practitioners to develop new coaching strategies designed to meet patients’ individual needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ada J ter Maten‐Speksnijder & Jolanda Dwarswaard & Pauline L Meurs & AnneLoes van Staa, 2016. "Rhetoric or reality? What nurse practitioners do to provide self‐management support in outpatient clinics: an ethnographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3219-3228, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3219-3228
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13345
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Silje Havrevold Henni & Marit Kirkevold & Konstantinos Antypas & Christina Foss, 2019. "The integration of new nurse practitioners into care of older adults: A survey study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2911-2923, August.
    2. Lars Thrysoee & Anna Strömberg & Axel Brandes & Jeroen M Hendriks, 2018. "Management of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in an outpatient clinic setting—patient's perspectives and experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 601-611, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3219-3228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.