IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p3010-3025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing togetherness throughout the phases of dementia: a qualitative study exploring how spouses maintain relationships with partners with dementia who live in institutional care

Author

Listed:
  • Linn Hege Førsund
  • Riina Kiik
  • Kirsti Skovdahl
  • Siri Ytrehus

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and describe how spouses involve themselves in the relationship with their partners with dementia who live in institutional care. Background Positive reciprocity between partners has been proven to be significant for spouses with partners living with dementia at home. However, little is known about spousal involvement after placement of a partner in an institutional setting. This subject was therefore the focus of this study. Design Constructivist grounded theory was used to develop meaningful concepts considering the relational processes experienced and described by the spouses. Methods Interviews were conducted with 15 spouses (eight women and seven men ranging in age from 64–90 years) of dementia‐afflicted persons living in institutional care. Theoretical sampling, constant comparison and memo‐writing guided the data collection and analysis. Results The analysis showed how the spouses adopted different visiting routines to preserve continuity in their relationship throughout the phases of dementia. Three categories described how these visiting routines were used and adapted along with their partners’ dementia progressions in the process of constructing togetherness: ‘maintaining involvement and intimacy to preserve continuity in their relationship,’ ‘structuring visits to facilitate interaction and communication’ and ‘pursuing moments of mutuality to preserve continuity in a deteriorating relationship.’ Conclusions Being involved and experiencing continuity in the relationship seemed important to the spouses after their partners’ placement in institutional care. In the process of constructing togetherness, visiting routines were used to facilitate situations in which they could connect with their partners. These routines were continuously adjusted throughout the phases of dementia. Relevance to clinical practice There is a need for a systematic approach to provide sufficient support to spouses throughout their partners’ dementia progressions to assist their ongoing involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Linn Hege Førsund & Riina Kiik & Kirsti Skovdahl & Siri Ytrehus, 2016. "Constructing togetherness throughout the phases of dementia: a qualitative study exploring how spouses maintain relationships with partners with dementia who live in institutional care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 3010-3025, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:3010-3025
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13320
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Eika & Geir Arild Espnes & Olle Söderhamn & Sigrun Hvalvik, 2014. "Experiences faced by next of kin during their older family members’ transition into long‐term care in a Norwegian nursing home," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2186-2195, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:3010-3025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.