IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i19-20p2863-2873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staff perceptions of best practice for information transfer about multitrauma patients on discharge from the emergency department: a focus group study

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Calleja
  • Leanne Aitken
  • Marie Cooke

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To understand: (1) staff perceptions of best practice for information transfer for multitrauma patients on discharge from the emergency department; (2) what information should be conveyed at transfer and (3) how information is transferred. Background Information transfer for multitrauma patients is an integral factor for continuity of care, safety, quality assurance and patient outcomes; however, this has not been the focus of previous studies. Design This was a qualitative study using focus group interviews. Methods Data were collected during focus group interviews across five clinical areas. Themes were derived from the data with consensus from three data coders. Purposive sampling was used and included staff caring for trauma patients during patient transition out of the emergency department. Participants were representatives of the emergency department, perioperative care, intensive care unit, high dependency care unit and the trauma service unit. Twenty‐six registered nurses and two medical officers participated. Results Five focus group interviews were held. Themes emerged from the data including ‘Variability’, ‘Continuity’ and ‘Putting the pieces together’. The first three themes were all influenced by the fourth theme of ‘Values/Context’. Considered together these themes influenced staff perception of the quality of information transfer for multitrauma patients on discharge from the emergency department. Conclusions Staff perceived best practice for information transfer to be clear, concise, relevant documentation that travelled with the patient and interactive communication at handover that adhered to agreed principles and a minimum data set specific to trauma patients. Relevance to clinical practice Clinicians involved in handover need to actively listen, avoiding ‘doing’ at the same time, be aware of essential questions to ask about the patient. An agreed expectation between different clinical areas needs to exist about information transfer to reduce variability. The minimum data required to provide ongoing safe care for multitrauma patients are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Calleja & Leanne Aitken & Marie Cooke, 2016. "Staff perceptions of best practice for information transfer about multitrauma patients on discharge from the emergency department: a focus group study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2863-2873, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2863-2873
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13334
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elaine Cole & Nicola Crichton, 2006. "The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(10), pages 1257-1266, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgia Tobiano & Christine Ting & Christine Ryan & Kim Jenkinson & Lucie Scott & Andrea P. Marshall, 2020. "Front‐line nurses' perceptions of intra‐hospital handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2231-2238, July.
    2. Pauline Calleja & Leanne M. Aitken & Marie Cooke, 2020. "Strategies to Improve Information Transfer for Multitrauma Patients," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(6), pages 398-410, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:19-20:p:2863-2873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.