IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i17-18p2629-2638.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing ‘subject matter experts’: an improvement methodology programme for acute postoperative pain with patients post major surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Laserina O Connor

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the effectiveness of an improvement methodology initiative, directed at refining the quality of acute pain management of patients in the first 24 hours post major surgery using the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire, pre‐ and post development of a ‘subject matter experts’ acute pain programme. Background Accurately measuring effectiveness of acute pain management post major surgery is intertwined with measuring overall patient satisfaction. A critical element of quality evaluation is obtaining direct feedback from patients about the here‐and‐now pain experiences post major surgery. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional, observational study was conducted in a large university hospital in Ireland. The questionnaire was completed with patients within 24 hours post major surgery, i.e., cardiothoracic, breast, gynaecological, gastrointestinal and urology surgery. The nurse participants were selected based on their commitment to play a key role in acute pain management. The study consisted of: a pre programme phase (n = 100 patients), an intervention phase – ‘subject matter experts’ acute pain programme (n = 24 nurses) and a postprogramme phase (n = 100 patients). Results Over a quarter of patients were in severe pain for long periods in the first 24 hours post major surgery. These findings were linked not only to ineffective analgesia from some pain drug therapies but also to contradictory messages from nurses. Over half of the patients’ pre‐ and postintervention reported satisfaction with acute pain management, whereas the remainder were dissatisfied and some sought answers to their suboptimum pain status. The ‘subject matter experts’ had a noteworthy impact on the patients’ pain beliefs. Conclusions The findings revealed that a ‘subject matter experts’ acute pain programme can have a positive impact on pain management in the immediate phase post major surgery. Relevance to clinical practice The role making of ‘subject matter experts’ in acute pain is a tactical approach towards achieving optimum patient pain control in the immediate phase post major surgery.

Suggested Citation

  • Laserina O Connor, 2016. "Developing ‘subject matter experts’: an improvement methodology programme for acute postoperative pain with patients post major surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2629-2638, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2629-2638
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Tocher & Sheila Rodgers & Margaret AC Smith & Deborah Watt & Lesley Dickson, 2012. "Pain management and satisfaction in postsurgical patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3361-3371, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cafer Özdemir & Ebru Karazeybek & Yetkin Söyüncü, 2022. "Relationship Between Quality of Care and Patient Care Outcomes for Postoperative Pain in Major Orthopedic Surgery: Analytical and Cross-Sectional Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(3), pages 530-540, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2629-2638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.