IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i17-18p2468-2477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing a nurse's decision to question medication administration in a neonatal clinical care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Laurene Aydon
  • Yvonne Hauck
  • Margo Zimmer
  • Jamee Murdoch

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence nurse's decisions to question concerning aspects of medication administration within the context of a neonatal clinical care unit. Background Medication error in the neonatal setting can be high with this particularly vulnerable population. As the care giver responsible for medication administration, nurses are deemed accountable for most errors. However, they are recognised as the forefront of prevention. Minimal evidence is available around reasoning, decision making and questioning around medication administration. Therefore, this study focuses upon addressing the gap in knowledge around what nurses believe influences their decision to question. Design A critical incident design was employed where nurses were asked to describe clinical incidents around their decision to question a medication issue. Nurses were recruited from a neonatal clinical care unit and participated in an individual digitally recorded interview. Results One hundred and three nurses participated between December 2013–August 2014. Use of the constant comparative method revealed commonalities within transcripts. Thirty‐six categories were grouped into three major themes: ‘Working environment’, ‘Doing the right thing’ and ‘Knowledge about medications’. Conclusions Findings highlight factors that influence nurses’ decision to question issues around medication administration. Nurses feel it is their responsibility to do the right thing and speak up for their vulnerable patients to enhance patient safety. Negative dimensions within the themes will inform planning of educational strategies to improve patient safety, whereas positive dimensions must be reinforced within the multidisciplinary team. Relevance to clinical practice The working environment must support nurses to question and ultimately provide safe patient care. Clear and up to date policies, formal and informal education, role modelling by senior nurses, effective use of communication skills and a team approach can facilitate nurses to appropriately question aspects around medication administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurene Aydon & Yvonne Hauck & Margo Zimmer & Jamee Murdoch, 2016. "Factors influencing a nurse's decision to question medication administration in a neonatal clinical care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2468-2477, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2468-2477
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13277
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily Rohde & Elizabeth Domm, 2018. "Nurses’ clinical reasoning practices that support safe medication administration: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 402-411, February.
    2. Noort, Mark C. & Reader, Tom W. & Gillespie, Alex, 2019. "Speaking up to prevent harm: a systematic review of the safety voice literature," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100774, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2468-2477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.