IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2200-2210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single‐room usage patterns and allocation decision‐making in an Australian public hospital: a sequential exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa J. Bloomer
  • Susan F. Lee
  • David P. Lewis
  • Mary Anne Biro
  • Cheryle Moss

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aims are to (1) measure occupancy rates of single and shared rooms; (2) compare single room usage patterns and (3) explore the practice, rationale and decision‐making processes associated with single rooms; across one Australian public health service. Background There is a tendency in Australia and internationally to increase the proportion of single patient rooms in hospitals. To date there have been no Australian studies that investigate the use of single rooms in clinical practice. Design This study used a sequential exploratory design with data collected in 2014. Methods A descriptive survey was used to measure the use of single rooms across a two‐week time frame. Semi‐structured interviews were undertaken with occupancy decision‐makers to explore the practices, rationale decision‐making process associated with single‐room allocation. Results Total bed occupancy did not fall below 99·4% during the period of data collection. Infection control was the primary reason for patients to be allocated to a single room, however, the patterns varied according to ward type and single‐room availability. For occupancy decision‐makers, decisions about patient allocation was a complex and challenging process, influenced and complicated by numerous factors including occupancy rates, the infection status of the patient/s, funding and patient/family preference. Bed moves were common resulting from frequent re‐evaluation of need. Conclusion Apart from infection control mandates, there was little tangible evidence to guide decision‐making about single‐room allocation. Further work is necessary to assist nurses in their decision‐making. Relevance to clinical practice There is a trend towards increasing the proportion of single rooms in new hospital builds. Coupled with the competing clinical demands for single room care, this study highlights the complexity of nursing decision‐making about patient allocation to single rooms, an issue urgently requiring further attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa J. Bloomer & Susan F. Lee & David P. Lewis & Mary Anne Biro & Cheryle Moss, 2016. "Single‐room usage patterns and allocation decision‐making in an Australian public hospital: a sequential exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2200-2210, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2200-2210
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2200-2210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.