IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2083-2100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What does the literature tell us about health workers' experiences of task‐shifting projects in sub‐Saharan Africa? A systematic, qualitative review

Author

Listed:
  • Hana Mijovic
  • Jacob McKnight
  • Mike English

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To review systematically, qualitative literature covering the implementation of task shifting in sub‐Saharan Africa to address the growing interest in interventions of this kind. This review aims to distil the key practical findings to both guide a specific project aiming to improve the quality of neonatal care in Kenya and to contribute to the broader literature. Background Task‐shifting programmes aim to improve access to healthcare by delegating specific tasks from higher to lower skilled health workers. Evidence suggests that task‐shifting programmes in sub‐Saharan Africa may improve patient outcomes, but they have also been criticised for providing fragmented, unsustainable services. This systematic review of qualitative literature summarises factors affecting implementation of task shifting and how such interventions in sub‐Saharan Africa may have affected health workers' feelings about their own positions and their ability to provide care. Design Following literature search, a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) framework was used to assess quality. Thereafter, analysis adopted a thematic synthesis approach. Methods A systematic literature search identified qualitative studies examining task ‐shifting interventions in sub‐Saharan Africa. Thematic synthesis was used to identify overarching themes arising from across the studies and infer how task‐shifting interventions may impact on the health workers from whom tasks are being shifted. Results From the 230 studies screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Overarching themes identified showed that task shifting has been associated with jurisdictional debates linked to new cadres working beyond their scope of practice, and tension around compensation and career development for those taking on tasks that were being delegated. Conclusions Based on the qualitative data available, it appears that task shifting may negatively impact the sense of agency and the ability to perform of health workers' from whom tasks are shifted. The potential implications of task shifting on all health workers should be considered prior to implementing task‐shifting solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hana Mijovic & Jacob McKnight & Mike English, 2016. "What does the literature tell us about health workers' experiences of task‐shifting projects in sub‐Saharan Africa? A systematic, qualitative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2083-2100, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2083-2100
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Trang, Kathy & Ly, An Thanh & Lam, Le Xuan & Brown, Carolyn A. & To, Margaret Q. & Sullivan, Patrick S. & Worthman, Carol M. & Giang, Le Minh & Jovanovic, Tanja, 2021. "Mental health in HIV prevention and care: A qualitative study of challenges and facilitators to integration in Vietnam," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2083-2100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.