IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i13-14p2018-2027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paediatric International Nursing Study: using person‐centred key performance indicators to benchmark children's services

Author

Listed:
  • Tanya McCance
  • Val Wilson
  • Kelly Kornman

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of the Paediatric International Nursing Study was to explore the utility of key performance indicators in developing person‐centred practice across a range of services provided to sick children. The objective addressed in this paper was evaluating the use of these indicators to benchmark services internationally. Background This study builds on primary research, which produced indicators that were considered novel both in terms of their positive orientation and use in generating data that privileges the patient voice. This study extends this research through wider testing on an international platform within paediatrics. Design The overall methodological approach was a realistic evaluation used to evaluate the implementation of the key performance indicators, which combined an integrated development and evaluation methodology. Methods The study involved children's wards/hospitals in Australia (six sites across three states) and Europe (seven sites across four countries). Qualitative and quantitative methods were used during the implementation process, however, this paper reports the quantitative data only, which used survey, observations and documentary review. Results The findings demonstrate the quality of care being delivered to children and their families across different international sites. The benchmarking does, however, highlight some differences between paediatric and general hospitals, and between the different key performance indicators across all the sites. Conclusions The findings support the use of the key performance indicators as a novel method to benchmark services internationally. Whilst the data collected across 20 paediatric sites suggest services are more similar than different, benchmarking illuminates variations that encourage a critical dialogue about what works and why. Relevance to clinical practice The transferability of the key performance indicators and measurement framework across different settings has significant implications for practice. The findings offer an approach to benchmarking and celebrating the successes within practice, while learning from partners across the globe in further developing person‐centred cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanya McCance & Val Wilson & Kelly Kornman, 2016. "Paediatric International Nursing Study: using person‐centred key performance indicators to benchmark children's services," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 2018-2027, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:13-14:p:2018-2027
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanya McCance & Lorna Telford & Julie Wilson & Olive MacLeod & Audrey Dowd, 2012. "Identifying key performance indicators for nursing and midwifery care using a consensus approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(7‐8), pages 1145-1154, April.
    2. Tanya McCance & Jack Hastings & Hilda Dowler, 2015. "Evaluating the use of key performance indicators to evidence the patient experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3084-3094, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jenny Sim & Patrick Crookes & Kenneth Walsh & Elizabeth Halcomb, 2018. "Measuring the outcomes of nursing practice: A Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 368-378, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanya McCance & Jack Hastings & Hilda Dowler, 2015. "Evaluating the use of key performance indicators to evidence the patient experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3084-3094, November.
    2. Pundziene, Asta & Sermontyte-Baniule, Rima & Rialp-Criado, Josep & Chesbrough, Henry, 2023. "Indirect effect of open innovation on clinical and economic value creation in digital healthcare: A comparative study of European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Martyn C Jones & Brian Williams & Janice Rattray & Steve MacGillivray & Debbie Baldie & Abdul‐Razak Abubakari & Joanne Coyle & Susan Mackie & Eileen McKenna, 2018. "Extending the assessment of patient‐centredness in health care: Development of the updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale using exploratory factor analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 65-76, January.
    4. Jenny M Parr & Jeanette Bell & Jane Koziol‐McLain, 2018. "Evaluating fundamentals of care: The development of a unit‐level quality measurement and improvement programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2360-2372, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:13-14:p:2018-2027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.