IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i1-2p99-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Li‐Chun Lin
  • Sheuan Lee
  • Steve Wen‐Neng Ueng
  • Woung‐Ru Tang

Abstract

Aims and objectives The objective of this study was to test the reliability and construct validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale. Background The role of nurse practitioners has attracted international attention. The advanced nursing role played by nurse practitioners varies with national conditions and medical environments. To date, no suitable measurement tool has been available for assessing the roles and competencies of nurse practitioners in Asian countries. Design Secondary analysis of data from three studies related to nurse practitioners' role competencies. Methods We analysed data from 563 valid questionnaires completed in three studies to identify the factor structure of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale. To this end, we performed exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis extraction with varimax orthogonal rotation. The internal consistency reliabilities of the overall scale and its subscales were examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Results The scale had six factors: professionalism, direct care, clinical research, practical guidance, medical assistance, as well as leadership and reform. These factors explained 67·5% of the total variance in nurse practitioners' role competencies. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall scale was 0·98, and those of its subscales ranged from 0·83–0·97. Conclusion The internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale were good. The high internal consistency reliabilities suggest item redundancy, which should be minimised by using item response theory to enhance the applicability of this questionnaire for future academic and clinical studies. Relevance to clinical practice The Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale can be used as a tool for assessing the roles and competencies of nurse practitioners in Taiwan. Our findings can also serve as a reference for other Asian countries to develop the nurse practitioner role.

Suggested Citation

  • Li‐Chun Lin & Sheuan Lee & Steve Wen‐Neng Ueng & Woung‐Ru Tang, 2016. "Reliability and validity of the Nurse Practitioners' Roles and Competencies Scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 99-108, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:99-108
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:99-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.