IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i1-2p278-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/surgical unit

Author

Listed:
  • Terri Watkins
  • Lynn Whisman
  • Pamela Booker

Abstract

Aims and objectives Evaluate continuous vital sign surveillance as a tool to improve patient safety in the medical/surgical unit. Background Failure‐to‐rescue is an important measure of hospital quality. Patient deterioration is often preceded by changes in vital signs. However, continuous multi‐parameter vital sign monitoring may decrease patient safety with an abundance of unnecessary alarms. Design Prospective observational study at two geographically disperse hospitals in a single hospital system. Methods A multi‐parameter vital sign monitoring system was installed in a medical/surgical unit in Utah and one in Alabama providing continuous display of SpO2, heart rate, blood pressure and respiration rate on a central station. Alarm thresholds and time to alert annunciations were set based on prior analysis of the distribution of each vital sign. At the end of 4 weeks, nurses completed a survey on their experience. An average alert per patient, per day was determined retrospectively from the saved vital signs data and knowledge of the alarm settings. Results Ninety‐two per cent of the nurses agreed that the number of alarms and alerts were appropriate; 54% strongly agreed. On average, both units experienced 10·8 alarms per patient, per day. One hundred per cent agreed the monitor provided valuable patient data that increased patient safety; 79% strongly agreed. Conclusions Continuous, multi‐parameter patient monitoring could be performed on medical/surgical units with a small and appropriate level of alarms. Continuous vital sign assessment may have initiated nursing interventions that prevented failure‐to‐rescue events. Nurses surveyed unanimously agreed that continuous vital sign surveillance will help enhance patient safety. Relevance to clinical practice Nursing response to abnormal vital signs is one of the most important levers in patient safety, by providing timely recognition of early clinical deterioration. This occurs through diligent nursing surveillance, involving assessment, interpretation of data, recognition of a problem and meaningful response.

Suggested Citation

  • Terri Watkins & Lynn Whisman & Pamela Booker, 2016. "Nursing assessment of continuous vital sign surveillance to improve patient safety on the medical/surgical unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 278-281, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:278-281
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soo-Joung Lee & Yun-Mi Lee & Eun Ji Seo & Youn-Jung Son, 2021. "Impact of Hospital Nurses’ Perception on Clinical Alarms and Patient Safety Culture on Alarm Management Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Femke L. Becking-Verhaar & Robin P. H. Verweij & Marjan de Vries & Hester Vermeulen & Harry van Goor & Getty J. Huisman-de Waal, 2023. "Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring with a Wireless Device on a General Ward: A Survey to Explore Nurses’ Experiences in a Post-Implementation Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Jiasi Bi & Xin Yin & Hongyan Li & Ruitong Gao & Qing Zhang & Tangsheng Zhong & Tao Zan & Baoxing Guan & Zhen Li, 2020. "Effects of monitor alarm management training on nurses’ alarm fatigue: A randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4203-4216, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:1-2:p:278-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.